- tlhIngan-Hol - lists.kli.org

In klingon about english
by mayqel qunenoS 14 Dec '16

14 Dec '16

as ridiculous as this may be, DIvI' Hol bopbogh qay'wI''e' vIyajmeH tlhIngal Hol vIlo' ! mu'tlhegh "we both know this problem" wIjatlh wIneHchugh vaj majatlhlaH: 1. "you and I know this problem" 2. "you and me know this problem" qaStaHvIS DIS law', lugh DuH cha' neH 'e' vIHar. 'a qen DIvI' Hol much vIbejtaHvIS, DuH wa' vItu' ! qaStaH nuq. jIHvaD, lughbogh DuH yIngu'. qunnoH jan puqloD ghoghwIj HablI'vo' vIngeHta'

2 2

Who shall call them from the twilight ?
by mayqel qunenoS 14 Dec '16

14 Dec '16

ngechDaq lIghtaHvIS chaH, ghel gimli: Daqvam chImDaq yInlaH mangghoH Sar nuq; 'ej jang legolas: mangghom mIgh.. ghIq QIjchoH: poH nI' ret, gondor ta' QavvaD lay' HuD'a' loDpu': luQaHmeH pawqang 'ej Suv. 'ach lIbchoHDI' Qob'a' 'ej QaH SuqnIschu' gondor, Haw' chaH.. HuD'a' QIbmeyDaq ngab. vaj roj luSuqlaHbe'meH chaH qIch isildur. 'Ipchaj luquvmoHDI', qaSDI' wanI'vam'e' neH, ghanHa'qa'laH qa'chaj. choS QIbmeyvo' rItlaH 'Iv. nuvpu''e' lIjbogh Hoch.. loD cho'wI' neH.. loDvaD lay'ta'bogh chaH. northvo' paw. raD Qob'a'. lojmIt'a' vegh, HeghwI'pu' tawmey 'el.. qunnoH jan puqloD

4 20

Re: [tlhIngan Hol] Adjective suffixes
by André Müller 13 Dec '16

13 Dec '16

Somewhere (TKD I suppose) it's written that the only suffixes following a verb used as an adjective can be the negation suffixes {-be', -Ha'} and the intensifier {-qu'}. I think it's logical that both can occur together. So I have no doubts that you can say {Duj tInqu'be'} with the intended meaning. But other suffixes are excluded, do the answer to question 2 is no. It is easily understood, but ungrammatical. - André On 13 Dec 2016 08:18, "mayqel qunenoS" <mihkoun(a)gmail.com> wrote: I've been meaning to ask.. 1st question: Can we have on a be-verb which is used adjectively, more than one rover-type suffix ? Can we write {Duj tInqu'be'} for "not very big ship" ? 2nd question: Can we have on a be-verb which is used adjectively, a non-rover suffix ? Can I write {Duj tInba'} for "obviously big ship" ? qunnoH jan puqloD _______________________________________________ tlhIngan-Hol mailing list tlhIngan-Hol(a)lists.kli.org http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org

6 11

Because of the ... which it ...
by mayqel qunenoS 13 Dec '16

13 Dec '16

I was wondering how to say: "because of the revenge this custom epitomizes". Normally I should write: {bortaS'e'mo' chIwbogh tIghvam}, but obviously since {'e'} and {mo'} can't co-exist this is wrong.. So, unless I split the desired phrase into more sentences, then I guess one cannot say it in klingon through the use of only one phrase, right ? qunnoH jan puqloD

2 4

Klingon Word of the Day: naDHa'ghach
by qurgh＠wizage.net 13 Dec '16

13 Dec '16

Klingon Word of the Day for Tuesday, December 13, 2016 Klingon word: naDHa'ghach Part of speech: noun Definition: discommendation Source: ADD This Klingon Word of the Day is brought to you by qurgh (qurgh(a)kli.org)

2 1

Star Trek: Discovery announcement
by De'vID 13 Dec '16

13 Dec '16

ngoy' 'Iv? http://www.startrek.com/article/qapla-discovery-introduces-the-klingons -- De'vID

2 1

Adjective suffixes
by mayqel qunenoS 13 Dec '16

13 Dec '16

I've been meaning to ask.. 1st question: Can we have on a be-verb which is used adjectively, more than one rover-type suffix ? Can we write {Duj tInqu'be'} for "not very big ship" ? 2nd question: Can we have on a be-verb which is used adjectively, a non-rover suffix ? Can I write {Duj tInba'} for "obviously big ship" ? qunnoH jan puqloD

1 0

The good samaritan
by mayqel qunenoS 12 Dec '16

12 Dec '16

poH nI' ret, tawDaq yIt loD Hurgh.. qaStaHvIS DIS law', HoS'a' Hurgh chavmeH qeqtaH loDvetlh, 'ej QapmeH vumta'mo', tagha' ngoQDaj chavta': wa' lumoj HoS'a' Hurgh qa'Daj je. 'a ghalchoH Qun'a'; lajQo'ta'mo' loDvam, ghalchoH Qun’a’.. vaj tawvetlhDaq yIttaHvIS loDvetlh HIv Qun’a’.. qa'Daj qIp 'ej pe'vIl tIqDajvo' HoS'a' Hurgh lel. ghIq toy'wI''a' mojmoHmeH qa'DajDaq HoSqoq wov lan. tagha' Humanpu' muSmo' Qunvam, lon.. ‘ach, HoSqoq wov lajlaHbe' loDvetlh. HoSqoqvammo' 'oy'taH 'ej noghtaH. 'ach Do', tawvetlhDaq yIt je qa' mIgh. loDvetlh leghDI' vup, vaj QaHmeH vang: tIqDajvo' HoSqoq wov lelmeH ghe''or rIt. ghIq chIrgh HurghDaq loDvetlh qeng 'ej pIn’a’pu’ qIj ra': joHma' ngay'vaD loDvam yIHurghmoH ! tagha' ghe''orDaq cheghmeH chIrghvetlhvo' ngab. ..qaStaHvIS DIS law', Qun'a' QIH lutI'meH nID pIn’a’pu’vam Hurgh 'ej tagha' Qap. pIvchoH loD'e' QIDta’bogh Qun'a', ‘ej tIqDajvo' HoSqoq wov vuj. SIbI' joH'a' Hurgh naD 'ej tawDaq lengqa'. qunnoH jan puqloD

1 0

Klingon Word of the Day: jorneb
by qurgh＠wizage.net 12 Dec '16

12 Dec '16

Klingon Word of the Day for Monday, December 12, 2016 Klingon word: jorneb Part of speech: noun Definition: warhead (of a torpedo) Source: KGT:E-K This Klingon Word of the Day is brought to you by qurgh (qurgh(a)kli.org)

1 0

How do you explain {'InSong} ?
by mayqel qunenoS 12 Dec '16

12 Dec '16

we are always saying that klingon phonology utilizes cvc. so, how do you explain {'InSong} ? qunnoH jan puqloD ghoghwIj HablI'vo' vIngeHta'

11 27