- tlhIngan-Hol - lists.kli.org

Re: [tlhIngan Hol] two type-5 on a {-bogh} phrase
by Daniel Dadap 27 Jun '19

27 Jun '19

> On Jun 27, 2019, at 08:22, terrence.donnelly <terrence.donnelly(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: > > Since when has any suffix besides -'e' been legal on either noun which is the subject or object of a relative verb? Did Okrand change his statement that he couldn't make it work as anything but subject or object and I missed it? Huh, I’m new here so I hadn’t been aware that there was a restriction that relative clauses can only act as subjects or objects. I swear I’ve seen counterexamples besides what we’re discussing right now, but they were probably non-canon examples. > >> On 6/27/2019 9:00 AM, Daniel Dadap wrote: >>> On Jun 27, 2019, at 01:46, De'vID <de.vid.jonpin(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> qeylIS'e' lIjlaHbe'bogh vay'vaD gha'tlhIq vIbom. >> Why not {qeylISvaD lIjlaHbe'bogh vay'}? > These mean very different things. > Right, and the version with {qeylISvaD} is the one that matches De'vID’s English sentence. Hence my asking why not {qeylISvaD}.

1 1

two type-5 on a {-bogh} phrase
by mayqel qunen'oS 27 Jun '19

27 Jun '19

Out of curiosity, since I can't think of an example.. Lets say we have a {-bogh} phrase, e.g. {bartIq leghbogh vIghro'}. Is there a rule which prohibits, one of the nouns having a type-5, e.g. {-'e'}, *and* at the same time the other noun having a type-5 too, e.g. {-mo'}, {-Daq}, {-vo'}, {-vaD} ? ~ m. qunen'oS

6 9

Doch yIngu'.
by Lieven L. Litaer 27 Jun '19

27 Jun '19

qaStaHvIS lup wa'logh qaS. qaStaHvIS tup wa'logh qaS. qaStaHvIS rep wa'logh qaS. qaStaHvIS jaj paghlogh qaS. Doch vIDelbogh yIngu'. -- Lieven L. Litaer aka the "Klingon Teacher from Germany" http://www.klingonisch.de http://www.klingonwiki.net/En/KlingonLanguage

3 2

Re: [tlhIngan Hol] Doch yIngu'.
by Michael Kúnin 27 Jun '19

27 Jun '19

> qaStaHvIS lup wa'logh qaS. > qaStaHvIS tup wa'logh qaS. > qaStaHvIS rep wa'logh qaS. > qaStaHvIS jaj paghlogh qaS. > > Doch vIDelbogh yIngu'. --------- {pay} tlhIngan Hol ngutlh 'oH'a'?

1 0

natural well
by mayqel qunen'oS 27 Jun '19

27 Jun '19

We have the {Daqrab} for "well", however it refers to a well which is constructed, rather a natural occuring one. So, how do we describe the natural occuring type ? Can we say {Daqrab but} ? Although, perhaps this would mean "natural constructed well". Or aren't there natural occuring wells on Qo'noS ? Or to say "natural well", we just write *natural well*, and that's it ? ~ m. qunen'oS

5 4

And now..
by mayqel qunen'oS 26 Jun '19

26 Jun '19

'ej DaH.. QongtaHvIS vIghro' tIQ.. 'ej QongtaHvIS Depvam qub, rewve'Daq bIHtaHvIS 'uSDu'Daj'e.. (yoymo' vIghro'vam, QongtaHvIS..) DaH, maQongnIS je. QongtaHvIS vIghro' tIQ, maQong je 'e' poQ vIghro'vam. (QongtaHvIS Depvam, maQongQo'chugh, vaj QeHqu'choH vIghro' tIQ, vaj Qobqu'choH..) vaj, maQongnISchoH. qaSjaj ram QaQ. ~ m. qunen'oS

1 0

Klingon Word of the Day: Qay'mol teSra'
by Klingon Word of the Day 26 Jun '19

26 Jun '19

Klingon Word of the Day for Wednesday, June 26, 2019 Klingon word: Qay'mol teSra' Part of speech: noun Definition: puzzle piece (referring to a jigsaw puzzle) Source: qepHom 2018 This Klingon Word of the Day is brought to you by qurgh (qurgh(a)kli.org)

2 1

muSmeH paq
by mayqel qunen'oS 26 Jun '19

26 Jun '19

mab'a' chu' vImughtaHvIS, mumer wa' ngoD. paqvam muSmeH laH vIHarlaHbe'; laHvam luDellaHbe' mu'mey. mIgh paqvam. Humanpu' muSba' ghItlhwI'Daj. ghe''or luDabbogh nuvpu' 'ej meQbogh jaltaHvIS ghItlhwI'Daj, ngagh'eghba'.. qaSbe'chugh ghu'vam, vaj paqvam QeH vIQIjlaHbe'. ..'ej jISIv, Qunqoqvammo', Daw'pu' wejmaH wej vatlhvI' *angel*pu'Daj Human Segh Hoch je. vaj pIch ghaj 'Iv ? Daw'pu'chugh HochHom, vaj meq tu'nISlu'ba'.. ~ m. qunen'oS

2 2

Difference between {rIp} and {yej}
by mayqel qunen'oS 25 Jun '19

25 Jun '19

Both {rIp} and {yej} mean "assembly, council". Is there any kind of difference between them, or are they perfect synonyms ? ~ m. qunen'oS

4 10

ghajchugh be'..
by mayqel qunen'oS 25 Jun '19

25 Jun '19

tIq qIj ghajchugh wa' be'.. ngup qIj tuQchugh wa' be'.. SuDchugh lurDu'chaj 'ej qol'om lurur.. vaj, qaq 'ej nIv be'vam. ~ m. qunen'oS

1 0