April 2022 - tlhIngan-Hol

Klingon Word of the Day: nguv
by Klingon Word of the Day 28 Apr '22

28 Apr '22

Klingon Word of the Day for Thursday, April 28, 2022 Klingon word: nguv Part of speech: verb Definition: be dyed, be stained, be tinted Source: KGT (222 KE, 240 EK, 258 EK, 261 EK) This Klingon Word of the Day is brought to you by qurgh (qurgh(a)kli.org)

2 1

Re: [tlhIngan Hol] combining {-meH} and {-bogh} on {-meH}'ed and {-bogh}'ed nouns
by D qunen'oS 28 Apr '22

28 Apr '22

fergusq: > There is a simple rule to follow when > evaluating {-bogh} clauses: if you remove > {-bogh}, the sentence should make > sense. I wasn't aware of this rule. Is this rule given by 'oqranD at some qep'a'/qepHom? -- Dana'an https://sacredtextsinklingon.wordpress.com/ Ζεὺς ἦν, Ζεὺς ἐστίν, Ζεὺς ἔσσεται· ὦ μεγάλε Ζεῦ

3 3

Re: [tlhIngan Hol] combining {-meH} and {-bogh} on {-meH}'ed and {-bogh}'ed nouns
by D qunen'oS 27 Apr '22

27 Apr '22

Thank you voragh and SuStel for taking the time to reply. But there's something I still don't understand. SuStel: > You can make a noun that participates in both a relative cause > and a purpose clause, but I don't believe you can 'ej them. > You can't say, for instance, nepbogh 'ej tojmeH which lies and for deceiving. But saying {nepbogh 'ej tojmeH mu'mey} isn't somehow equivalent to the {romuluSngan Sambogh 'ej HoHbogh nejwI'} "romulan hunter-killer probe"? If the {nepbogh 'ej tojbogh mu'mey} is correct, then why would the {nepbogh 'ej tojmeH mu'mey} be any different? We just substitute one type-9 with another. SuStel: > You CAN say nepbogh tojmeH mu'meylIj your words for deceiving which lie. I hadn't thought of this possibility. SuStel: > But why would you want to say it this way? > Why not say nepbogh mu'meylIj 'ej tojbogh > your words which lie and which deceive? I don't remember the exact context of the {nepbogh 'ej tojmeH mu'mey}; all I remember is that I was thinking something in Klingon, and my mind made the instinctive choice of combining {-bogh} and {-meH} this way. Of course you're right, and I agree with you. I could just say {nepbogh mu'meylIj 'ej tojbogh}. But I can't stop wondering about the {nepbogh 'ej tojmeH mu'mey}. I can't understand how/why it's any different from the allowed {nepbogh 'ej tojbogh}. -- Dana'an https://sacredtextsinklingon.wordpress.com/ Ζεὺς ἦν, Ζεὺς ἐστίν, Ζεὺς ἔσσεται· ὦ μεγάλε Ζεῦ

3 2

Re: [tlhIngan Hol] yIn nessy
by D qunen'oS 27 Apr '22

27 Apr '22

vabDot loch ness ngeng QaDmoHlu'chu'chugh, 'ej pa' pagh tu'lu', not choH vuDwIj. -- Dana'an https://sacredtextsinklingon.wordpress.com/ Ζεὺς ἦν, Ζεὺς ἐστίν, Ζεὺς ἔσσεται· ὦ μεγάλε Ζεῦ

1 1

Klingon Word of the Day: wIgh
by Klingon Word of the Day 27 Apr '22

27 Apr '22

Klingon Word of the Day for Wednesday, April 27, 2022 Klingon word: wIgh Part of speech: noun Definition: genius Source: TKD (113 KE, 135 EK) This Klingon Word of the Day is brought to you by qurgh (qurgh(a)kli.org)

2 1

yIn nessy
by D qunen'oS 27 Apr '22

27 Apr '22

yInbej loch ness tlhapragh; rorghbe'. reH 'e' vIHar, 'ej vuDwIj choHlaH pagh. tlhIHvaD vuDwIj vI'otHa' *vIneHpu', 'ej DaH, vuDvam vI'otHa'pu'mo', jIbelchoHpu'. -- Dana'an https://sacredtextsinklingon.wordpress.com/ Ζεὺς ἦν, Ζεὺς ἐστίν, Ζεὺς ἔσσεται· ὦ μεγάλε Ζεῦ

1 0

Klingon Word of the Day: nguH
by Klingon Word of the Day 27 Apr '22

27 Apr '22

Klingon Word of the Day for Tuesday, April 26, 2022 Klingon word: nguH Part of speech: verb Definition: testify Source: qepHom 2018 This Klingon Word of the Day is brought to you by qurgh (qurgh(a)kli.org)

4 3

combining {-meH} and {-bogh} on {-meH}'ed and {-bogh}'ed nouns
by D qunen'oS 26 Apr '22

26 Apr '22

Suppose I write: muSIghbe' nepbogh 'ej tojmeH mu'meylIj your lying and deceiving words don't deceive me Would that be correct? Could we create a noun which is both {-meH}'ed and {-bogh}'ed? -- Dana'an https://sacredtextsinklingon.wordpress.com/ Ζεὺς ἦν, Ζεὺς ἐστίν, Ζεὺς ἔσσεται· ὦ μεγάλε Ζεῦ

3 2

deanna now I understand you
by D qunen'oS 26 Apr '22

26 Apr '22

e When this damn bounce problem started, I wrote that this situation reminded me of Star Trek "Night Terrors" episode, where things kept getting worse and worse.. Yesterday, I joined this list with my yandex account, only to finally realize that three new problems appeared.. 1. The Yandex android app didn't offer any formatting options. 2. For some go figure reason, the messages I sent from my yandex account couldn't be read in the archives. So, how the jay' would I be able in the future to point to a specific mail I sent? 3. (brace yourselves) Whenever I sent a Klingon message from Yandex, Yandex classified this message as spam, because apparently it cannot understand that Klingon is a real goddamn language. So, it required (each and every jay' time) captcha verification.. Charming isn't it? It was then when I understood Troy, when at Night Terrors she said something like "Under other circumstances this could be funny". A part of myself wants to start cursing as if there's no tomorrow.. But since I've already cursed as if there's no tomorrow during the days I'm trying to figure out this mess, I'm already tired, so no. No more cursing. So, I removed from the mailing list my Yandex account, and rejoined with my Outlook one. Of course, the problem with the Outlook account was that (some?) messages from it ended in Spam, but I read somewhere that if you choose the option of utf-8 as mail format, instead of html, then usually this resolves the problem. I sincerely hope, that I've finally found the solution, and that I won't have to deal with this problem again. Because, as I said before, it pisses me off having to deal with others' mess, with problems I didn't create nor I am responsible for. t jIHvaD Hov leng night terrors lut qawmoH bounce ghu'vam qay'; jIjatlhpu', qaSchoHpu'DI' ghu'vam. 'arghtaH 'entepray' ghu' 'e' bop Hov leng lutvam. tetlhvam jeSwI' vImojqa'meH, wa'Hu' yandex mabwIj vIlo'pu'. 'a ghIq narghpu' wej ghu' qay' tugh 'e' vItu'. 1. QIn vIqonmeH, yandex android nIqHom vIlo'taHvIS, QIn ghe'choHmoHmeH DuHmey tu'lu'be'taH. 2. QIn vIngeHpu'DI', 'op ghu'meymo' vISovbe'bogh QIn tetlhvam tamey ngo'Daq QIn laDlaHbe' vay'. vaj tuch vay' vIqonpu'bogh vIrevnISchugh, chay' latlhpu'vaD QInvam vI'aghlaH? 3. (peghuH'eghmoH) Holna' 'oH tlhIngan Hol'e' 'a 'e' Dambe' yandex.. vaj QIn vIngeHmeH, jInIDtaHvIS, QInvamvaD spam Dam yandex, 'ej QInvam vIngeHmeH, captcha qaD vISIQ 'e' poQ yandex. Hochlogh jay'! wejpuH.. 'ej ngugh night terrors troy mu'mey vIyajchoHpu'; pa' jatlhpu' troy: pIm ghu' net jalchugh, chaq tlhaQ wanI'meyvam.. vaj mu'qaDmey vIbachtaH neHchoH wa' tIqwIj 'ay'; 'a qaStaHvIS jajmey vorgh, wejHa' mu'qaD 'Iq vIbachtaHmo' -ghu'vam vIDIghmeH, jInIDtaHvIS- wejHa' jIDoy'choHpu', vaj mu'qaDmey vIbachqa' vIneHbe'. 'ej tagha' tetlhvamDaq yandex mabwIj vIbaqpu', 'ej outlook mabwIj vIchu'qa'pu'. 'a ('op) QInmey ngeHtaHvIS vay', outlook lo'chugh, QIn luneHbe'lu'bogh ngaSwI'Daq QInmeyvam lan 'op QIn nIqHom, 'ej qay'bej ghu'vam. 'a vogh jIlaDpu': utf-8 tu'qom lo' vay'; html tu'qom lo' 'e' qa'; qaSchugh DuHvam, QIn luneHbe'lu'bogh ngaSwI'Daq QInmey lanbe' QIn nIqHom. ghu'vam (ghu'vam jay'..) vIDIghchu'pu' 'e' vItul, 'ej not jIHvaD Sengqa' ghu'vam 'e' vItulbej. wejHa' jIjatlhpu'mo': Seng'e' qaSmoHpu'bogh latlhpu' vIDIghnISchugh, qoj ghu'mey qay''e' narghmoHpu'bogh latlhpu' vIDIghnISchugh, jIQeHchoHchu' jay'. -- Dana'an https://sacredtextsinklingon.wordpress.com/ Ζεὺς ἦν, Ζεὺς ἐστίν, Ζεὺς ἔσσεται· ὦ μεγάλε Ζεῦ

4 6

Re: [tlhIngan Hol] Test, with apologies
by luis.chaparro＠web.de 25 Apr '22

25 Apr '22

Jeff Zeitlin: > I've just changed from GMail to Outlook, and am now ensuring that it works. I've received your message.

1 0