March 2022 - tlhIngan-Hol

Klingon Word of the Day: tera' tlhuH rop
by Klingon Word of the Day 28 Mar '22

28 Mar '22

Klingon Word of the Day for Monday, March 28, 2022 Klingon word: tera' tlhuH rop Part of speech: noun Definition: common cold Source: qep'a' 27 This Klingon Word of the Day is brought to you by qurgh (qurgh(a)kli.org)

3 2

Klingon Word of the Day: tlhong
by Klingon Word of the Day 28 Mar '22

28 Mar '22

Klingon Word of the Day for Sunday, March 27, 2022 Klingon word: tlhong Part of speech: verb Definition: barter, bargain Source: TKD (111 KE, 121 EK) This Klingon Word of the Day is brought to you by qurgh (qurgh(a)kli.org)

2 1

wejpuH
by mayqel qunen'oS 25 Mar '22

25 Mar '22

DaHjaj naDev qaS Sep lop, vaj mavumbe'. 'eQ jISoppu', 'ej jISopchoHpu'pa', jIQub: <jISoppu'DI', 'Internet DaqwIjDaq jImugh..> 'a lopmo' wa' HIvje' wine vItlhutlhpu', 'ej DaH jIQongnISmo', jImughlaHbe'. chaq jIyepHa', chaq Sun vIHutlh, chaq Human puj jIH.. 'a chay' Suto'vo'qor vI'el? -- Dana'an https://sacredtextsinklingon.wordpress.com/ Ζεὺς ἦν, Ζεὺς ἐστίν, Ζεὺς ἔσσεται· ὦ μεγάλε Ζεῦ

1 1

Klingon Word of the Day: woq
by Klingon Word of the Day 25 Mar '22

25 Mar '22

Klingon Word of the Day for Friday, March 25, 2022 Klingon word: woq Part of speech: verb Definition: confirm, substantiate, corroborate Source: qepHom 2017 This Klingon Word of the Day is brought to you by qurgh (qurgh(a)kli.org)

2 1

hellenic gods - epithets of gods - zeus part 10
by mayqel qunen'oS 25 Mar '22

25 Mar '22

*nemeius/nemeios:* *argos*Daq *zeus* *nemeius/nemeios* lulIgh quv tu’lu’pu’, pa’ jey’ Sorpuq HewDaj’e’ chenmoHpu’bogh *lysippus* tu’lu’pu’, ‘ej *zeus* quvmoHlu’meH, pa’ qaSpu’ Qujmey. *nemetor:* noDwI’; ruv qaSmoHbogh vay’. *nephelegereta:* ‘engmey yIrbogh vay’. *nicaeus:* yay chavbogh *zeus*. *nicephorus:* yay qengbogh vay’. *nomius:* peSbogh vay’. varHa’wI’. motlh Hatlh/Satlh bopbogh nuvpu”e’/Dochmey’e’/Sojmey’e’ luDellu’meH, <*nomius*> mu’ lo’lu’, ‘a naDev < *nomius*> QIj <*nemo*> wot; rap <*nemo*> {peS} wot je. *nomos:* Qunpu’ nuvpu’ je che’wI’ ghaHmo’ *zeus*‘e’, pongvam cha’DIch lo’lu’taHvIS, *zeus*vaD chut ‘oSbogh vay”e’ Damlu’. *ogoa:* *mysala*Daq *zeus* *caria* pong cha’DIch ‘oHpu’ *ogoa*‘e’. rut pa’, *zeus* chIrgh qoDDaq, bIQ’a’ yu’egh leghlu’pu’. *mysala* Qun pongmeH *strabo*, *caria* Hol Sar *osogo* pong lo’. *olympius/olympios:* *olympia*Daq *zeus* pongvam cha’DIch lo’lu’pu’ je, ‘ej pIj pongvam cha’DIch neH lo’lu’pu’ (<*zeus*> noplu’pu’), *zeus*vaD jatlhlu’taHvIS. ‘ach latlhpu’ pong cha’DIch ‘oH je *olympius*‘e’/*olympios*‘e’; *olympus* luDabbogh Qunpu’, *muses*, *heracles* je pong cha’DIch ‘oH je. *ombrimothymus:* Sub ghaHbogh vay”e’ ‘ej not bupbogh vay’; vay’ ghIjlu’be’bogh. not vay’ charghlu’bogh. *ombrius/ombrios:* SISmoHbogh vay’. *attica*Daq *hymettus* HuDDaq *zeus* *ombrius*/*ombrios* ‘anmoHmeH qachHom tu’lu’pu’. *paeon:* Qel; vorwI’; toDwI’; tlhabchoHmoHwI’. *rhodes* ‘ambayDaq pongvam cha’DIch lo’lu’pu’ je. *palamnaeus:* chotwI’pu’ bIjbogh vay’. *panamaros:* *caria*Daq pongvam cha’DIch lo’lu’pu’ je. pa’ *panamarea* (yupma’Daj) loplu’pu’. *pancrates:* HoSghajchu’bogh vay’. *panhellenius/panellenios:* Hoch ‘elaDya’nganpu’ Qun, Qun’e’ luquvmoHbogh Hoch ‘elaDya’nganpu’. *dodona* *zeus* pong cha’DIch ‘oH pongvam cha’DIch’e’, ‘ej *thessaly*vo’ *aegina* ‘ambay lujaHpu’DI’ ‘op *hellenes*, pa’ *dodona* *zeus* lalDanHom luqeng je. ghIq Hoch ‘elaDya’nganpu’ pong mojpu’DI’ *hellenes* pong, Hoch ‘elaDya’nganpu’ bopchoHpu’ pongvam cha’DIch. poH Qatlh tu’lu’pu’, ‘ej Qatlhpu’, ghungchu’taHmo’ Hoch, ‘ach Soj tu’lu’be’taH; ngugh ghu’vam qay’ ngabmoHmeH *aeacus*, *zeus*vaD ‘elaDya’nganpu’vaD je juppu’ mojnISmoH, vaj *zeus*vaD ‘annISmoHpu’. Hochvam SovmoHpu’ *delphi* Qun chabal ‘otHa’wI’. Qu’vam turchu’meH *aeacus*, *zeus*vaD ‘anmoHpu’, ‘ej vay’vamvaD ‘anmoHpu’bogh *aeacus* Hoch ‘elaDya’nganpu’ nob Dampu’ *aeacus*. ngugh maqpu’: Hoch ‘elaDya’nganpu’ Sep Qun ghaH *zeus*‘e’. *aegina*Daq *zeus* *panhellenius* lalDan lulIgh quv tu’lu’pu’, lulIghvam chenmoHpu’ *aeacus* net Har, ‘ej pa’ *panhellenia* yupma’ loplu’pu’. *zeus* *panhellenius*vaD Hoch ‘elaDya’nganpu’ QanwI’ Damlu’ je. *panomphaeus:* tuch lu’otHa’bogh Hoch mu’mey mung ghaHbogh vay”e’. tera’vamDaq tuch lu’otHa’bogh Hoch ghoghmey mung ghaH *zeus*‘e’ ‘e’ chIw pongvam cha’DIch. *zeus*mo’ laHDaj luHev Hoch tuch rItwI’pu’ ‘e’ chIw je pongvam cha’DIch. *panoptes:* Hoch leghbogh vay’. *pantogenethlos:* Hoch lIngbogh vay’; Hoch vav. *pantotinactes:* Hoch tavbogh vay’. *papaeus:* Hoch vav; pongvam cha’DIch QIjlu’meH, QIjlaw’ghachvam chuplu’pu’. *zeus* luquvmoHlu’taHvIS *scythia*nganpu’, pongvam cha’DIch lulo’ je. *parnethius/parnethios:* *attica*Daq *parnes* HuD tu’lu’, ‘ej HuDvammo’ pongvam cha’DIch qonlu’pu’. *parnes* HuDDaq *zeus* jey’ Sorpuq Hew tu’lu’pu’. *pasianax:* Hoch voDleH. *pater:* vav. *patrous/patroa/patroios/patroia:* pa’logh wa’ Qun luquvmoHchugh qempa’pu’/’emrIghpu’, ‘ej DaH Qunvam luquvmoHchugh je Sep Hoch, qorDu’ joq, *patrous*/*patroa*/*patroios*/*patroia* ‘oH je Qunvam pong cha’DIch’e’. rut QunvamvaD nuvpu’ mung Damlu’. vaj *athens*Daq *zeus* quvmoHlu’taHvIS, *patrous*/*patroios* pong cha’DIch lo’lu’ je. mungchaj ghaH *zeus*‘e’ ‘e’ luHar *heracleidae*, ‘ej luHarmo’, *zeus*vaD Qun *patrous*/*patroios* Damlu’. *pelasgicus:* *pelasgia*ngan. *dodona* Qun cha’bal ‘otHa’wI’ lucherpu’ *pelasgia*ngan ‘e’ luHarmo’ ‘op, pa’ -*dodona*Daq- pongvam cha’DIch lo’lu’ je. *phanaeus:* tamghay nobwI’, tamghay qemwI’. *philius:* juppu’ QanwI’. *phytalius:* Soj nobbogh vay’. *phytalmius:* Soj nobbogh vay’. *phyxius/phuzios:* narghmeH nuvpu’, Haw’; nuvpu’vam Qanbogh Qun. pa’logh *thessaly*Daq *zeus* pongvam cha’DIch lo’lu’ je. wa’ *apollo* pong cha’DIch ‘oH je. *pisaeus:* pa’logh *elis*Daq *pisa*Daq *zeus* pongvam cha’DIch lo’lu’ je. *pistius:* vIt bopbogh Qun. HarmeH laH Qun. *plusius:* yer law’qu’ ghajbogh vay’, mIpbogh vay’. mIp nobbogh vay’. *sparta*Daq *zeus* pongvam cha’DIch lo’lu’pu’ je. *plutodotes*: mIp nobbogh vay’. *polieus:* veng QanwI’. *athens* *acropolis*Daq *zeus* *polieus* ‘anmoHmeH qachHom tu’lu’pu’, qachHomDaq *wheat* *barley* je luvo’lu’pu’, bIH Soppu’ tangqa’, ‘ej ghIq *zeus*vaD tangqa’vam ‘anmoHta’ maqlegh. tangqa’ HoHpu’DI’ maqlegh, ‘obmaQ lo’pu’bogh polHa’ maqlegh, ghIq bo’DIjDaq ‘obmaQ qemlu’pu’, ‘ej pa’ mIwba’ SIQnISpu’ ‘obmaQ. qaStaHvIS *diipoleia* yupma’, *zeus* *polieus* quvmoHlu’. *poliuchus:* *zeus*, veng QanwI’. qaStaHvIS *diipoleia* yupma’, *zeus* *poliuchus* quvmoHlu’. *polytimetus:* wa’ quvqu’moHlu’bogh. *propator:* cherpu’bogh Qun wa’DIch, vav wa’DIch, vavnI’. *prostropaeus*: lam’a’ ‘ombogh vay’. *protus:* wa’DIch. *pyrphorus:* qul qemwI’. pe’bIl joH. -- Dana'an https://sacredtextsinklingon.wordpress.com/ Ζεὺς ἦν, Ζεὺς ἐστίν, Ζεὺς ἔσσεται· ὦ μεγάλε Ζεῦ

1 0

Klingon Word of the Day: tlhar
by Klingon Word of the Day 24 Mar '22

24 Mar '22

Klingon Word of the Day for Wednesday, March 23, 2022 Klingon word: tlhar Part of speech: verb Definition: be allergic, be allergic to Source: qep'a' 26 This Klingon Word of the Day is brought to you by qurgh (qurgh(a)kli.org)

3 2

expressing "reconcile" "I cause x and y to become friends" and {-chuqmoH} {-chuqqa'moH} {-chuqchoHmoH}
by mayqel qunen'oS 24 Mar '22

24 Mar '22

Recently, I needed to express "reconcile", so I went with "I cause x and y to become friends". HoDvaD yaSvaD je juppu' vImojmoH I cause the captain and the officer to become friends The first issue with this was that without context, one couldn't know whether the captain and the officer were friends, then stopped being friends, and then I cause the reconciliation, or whether prior to my action they were never friends to start with. Luckily, since the necessary context was available, this wasn't a problem. But then I realized something else. The klingon sentence literally says "I cause the captain and the officer to become friends", but it doesn't say that I cause them to become friends with each other. So it could be also understood as me causing them to become friends with some unmentioned third party. However, just before starting going down the rabbit hole of {-chuqmoH}/{-chuqqa'moH}/{-chuqchoHmoH}, I realized that perhaps there wasn't a problem since the same ambiguity exists as well in greek/english. So, I guess the questions are: 1. Do you agree with everything so far? 2. Is there a way to express "I cause x and y to become friends" with the {-chuqmoH}/{-chuqqa'moH}/{-chuqchoHmoH}? -- Dana'an https://sacredtextsinklingon.wordpress.com/ Ζεὺς ἦν, Ζεὺς ἐστίν, Ζεὺς ἔσσεται· ὦ μεγάλε Ζεῦ

5 6

Hovtay’ HurDaq rav vaghSaD yuQ woq NASA
by Steven Boozer 24 Mar '22

24 Mar '22

FYI: “NASA confirms more than 5,000 planets outside the solar system“ https://www.upi.com/Science_News/2022/03/22/NASA-exoplanets-planets-5000/96… [Can anyone think of a better way to say “at least 5,000”?] -- Voragh, Ca'Non Master of the Klingons Please contribute relevant vocabulary or notes from the last year or two. I’ve fallen woefully behind in updating my files.

5 8

Klingon Word of the Day: tetyub
by Klingon Word of the Day 24 Mar '22

24 Mar '22

Klingon Word of the Day for Thursday, March 24, 2022 Klingon word: tetyub Part of speech: noun Definition: enamel, coating Source: qep'a' 27 This Klingon Word of the Day is brought to you by qurgh (qurgh(a)kli.org)

2 2

joining numbers used for numbering by {je} and conjunctions
by mayqel qunen'oS 23 Mar '22

23 Mar '22

In a previous thread we wrote: (http://lists.kli.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol-kli.org/2022-March/019526.html) ****** Previous thread starts ****** jIH: > I want to say: > We fought the romulans during the second and third century > So I write: > qaStaHvIS vatlh DIS poH cha'DIch wejDIch je, romuluSngan DISuv > Would joining ordinals by {je} or any other conjunction be considered to be > correct? SuStel: > Dunno if we have evidence, but numbers of all sorts are noun-like enough that > I have no trouble treating them like nouns, even if they're not being used in the > way that TKD describes using numbers as nouns. > If you want to be certain of correctness, you could of course say qaStaHvIS > vatlh DIS poH cha'DIch, vatlh DIS poH wejDIch je.But I wouldn't bother. ****** Previous thread ends ****** I was going to ask whether we can join numbers used for numbering such as: flood torpedo tubes one and two DuS wa' cha' je tIbuy'choHmoH However, I think this must be pretty straightforward, since it's just {wa'} and {cha'} being placed after the noun instead of being placed before it. So I'm just writing this as a separate thread for the purpose of archiving this matter, thus avoiding to be asking about it again in the future. -- Dana'an https://sacredtextsinklingon.wordpress.com/ Ζεὺς ἦν, Ζεὺς ἐστίν, Ζεὺς ἔσσεται· ὦ μεγάλε Ζεῦ

4 5