January 2018 - tlhIngan-Hol

-bogh and je
by David Holt 25 Jan '18

25 Jan '18

Do we have an official way to describe an object with two {-bogh} verbs? If we want to use more than one verb that is not a "be" verb (or a more than two "be" verbs) how do we do that? We have {yoHbogh matlhbogh je SuvwI'}, but it doesn't seem good to me and I write it off as poetic licence. Even if we consider {je} to be acting adverbally here, I still have trouble with the object of {yoH} being in the following sentence. Has Dr. Okrand told us that this is the way to make two verbs describe one noun or are there better ways? Jeremy

2 5

Please Stand By
by Lieven L. Litaer 25 Jan '18

25 Jan '18

After a the entire scene has been published now, maybe qurgh can tell us more about these words. Unfortunately, the actor obviously messed up one phrase. See the Klingon wiki for details: http://www.klingonwiki.net/En/PleaseStandBy -- Lieven L. Litaer aka the "Klingon Teacher from Germany" http://www.klingonisch.de

2 1

LinkedIn vIlo'choH
by Lieven L. Litaer 25 Jan '18

25 Jan '18

qaStaHvIS DISmey law' 'oH vIlo' vIneHbe'. 'ach DaHjaj vuDwij vIchoHpu'. LinkedIn vImuv rIntaH. pa' muSam neHchugh vay', vaj choSammeH pongwIj yIlo': https://www.linkedin.com/in/lievenlitaer/ -- Lieven L. Litaer aka the "Klingon Teacher from Germany" http://www.klingonisch.de http://www.klingonwiki.net/En/StarTrekDiscovery

2 2

Klingon Word of the Day: bagh
by Klingon Word of the Day 25 Jan '18

25 Jan '18

Klingon Word of the Day for Thursday, January 25, 2018 Klingon word: bagh Part of speech: verb Definition: tie Source: ADD This Klingon Word of the Day is brought to you by qurgh (qurgh(a)kli.org)

2 1

context of nej
by mayqel qunenoS 24 Jan '18

24 Jan '18

I know we can say {'avwI' vInej} for "I search for the guard". Meaning "I'm trying to locate him". But could the same sentence {'avwI' vInej} mean as well "I search the guard" ? Meaning, "I search him in order to see if he is armed" ? ~ nI'ghma

3 2

Re: [tlhIngan Hol] dothraki Hol
by mayqel qunenoS 24 Jan '18

24 Jan '18

QapmeH Hol mutlhlu'ta'bogh, qaSnIS ghu' Sar. 'ej quqnIS ghu'meyvam.. tlhIngan HolvaD ghu'meyvam tu'lu'mo', Qap tlhIngan Hol: 1. Hov lengmo', noychoH tlhIngan Hol. 2. qaS tlhIngan Hol qep'a'mey qepHommey je. 3. tlhIngan Hol chenmoHtaH wa' nuv neH. 4. 'oqranD ghantoHmey neH pabqangchu' tlhIngan Hol yej'an Hoch. meqmeyvammo' noychoH tlhIngan Hol, 'ej meqmeyvammo' tlhIngan Hol wIlo'taHvIS mayajchuqlaH. qar'a' ? *dothraki* HolvaD loS ghu'vam tu'lu''a' ? ghobe'. Do'Ha' -*dothraki*vaD-, qaSbe' ghu'meyvam.. qaStaHvIS tuch, *dothraki*vaD qaS'a' ghu'meyvam ? Sov qeylIS neH.. 'a, not tlhIngan Hol Qapla' ghaj *dothraki*. 'e' vIHarbej. ~ nI'ghma On Jan 22, 2018 17:40, "André Müller" <esperantist(a)gmail.com> wrote: HaSta jIHDaq Hol 'oghlu'ta'bogh Qoylu'DI', reH jIQuch. *Na'vi* Hol ghajmo' *Avatar*, *Sindarin* *Quenya* je ghajmo' «Qebmey joH», *Lang Belta* ghajmo' *The Expanse*, jIQuch je. 'opleS *Na'vi* Hol vIghoj vIneH, Holtej tIqwIj belqu'moH Holvam. «quS Quj» («chuch qul je bom» joq) vIbejbe', jIHvo' Dajqu'be'mo', 'a Holmey pargh vIparHa'mo' *Dothraki* Hol pab mu'ghom je vIje'ta'. 'ach lujbej'a' Holvetlh? DaSovbe'bej, 'a «quS Quj» lumuSHa' qabDu' law'. lubej juppu'wI' law'. jav ben HaSta jIHDaq *Dothraki* Hol Qoylu'pu' qar'a'? DaH law'be' jatlhwI'pu'Daj, qar'a'? tera' DIS 1991 tlhIngan Hol jatlhwI'pu' law'qu''a'? chaq QIt ghur *Dothraki* Hol jatlhwI'pu' mI'... maSovbej. «quS Quj»-Daq latlh Hol jatlhlu' 'e' DaSov'a'? 'oHvaD *High Valyrian* ponglu'. paq tu'lu'be', 'ach 'InternetDaq *Duolingo* nIqHom Dalo'chugh, pa' Holvetlh DaghojlaH. vInIDpu'be' jIH. tlhIngan Hol lu'otHa'pa' jIloSlI'. pItlh. - André On Jan 22, 2018 15:59, "mayqel qunenoS" <mihkoun(a)gmail.com> wrote: > wa' nuv Segh 'agh *game of thrones*, 'ej SeghvamvaD *dothraki* ponglu'. > > maj.. > > 'ej, qen jIghoj: *dothraki* Hol tu'lu'. Holvam chenmoHlu'ta', 'ej pab > mu'tay je ghaj Holvam. > > maj, jIjatlhqa'. > > 'a, *dothraki* Hol vIQubtaHvIS, wa' DI'ruj vItlhoj: lujbej Holvam. SanDaj > 'oH. > > 'ej, qatlh luj *dothraki* Hol ? > > wa' meq le'mo'.. meqvammo' Qappu' tlhIngan Hol, 'a meqvam rapmo' luj > *dothraki* Hol: > > jatlhwI'pu'Daj mI'mo'.. > > qatlh Qappu' tlhIngan Hol ? Hov lengmo'. tlhIngan Hol noymoH Hov leng. > maj.. 'a wa' latlh meq tu'lu'. tlhIngan Hol lujatlhmo' nuv law'qu', > nenchoHlaH. HachchoHlaH. > > 'a *dothraki* Hol lujatlh nuv 'ar ? *dothraki* lujatlh nuv puSqu' neH. > vaj, HachlaHbe'. > > 'ej meqvammo', tagha' luj. > > ~ nI'ghma > > _______________________________________________ > tlhIngan-Hol mailing list > tlhIngan-Hol(a)lists.kli.org > http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org > > _______________________________________________ tlhIngan-Hol mailing list tlhIngan-Hol(a)lists.kli.org http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org

3 3

Klingon Word of the Day: pach
by Klingon Word of the Day 24 Jan '18

24 Jan '18

Klingon Word of the Day for Wednesday, January 24, 2018 Klingon word: pach Part of speech: noun Definition: claw Source: ADD This Klingon Word of the Day is brought to you by qurgh (qurgh(a)kli.org)

2 1

be verbs and {-vIp}
by mayqel qunenoS 23 Jan '18

23 Jan '18

If I write {jI'IQvIp}, then what does it mean ? a. I'm afraid I'm sad b. I'm afraid to be sad c. all of the above d. any of the above (a,b, or c) depending on context ~ nI'ghma

3 2

{-be'} on {-lu'}.. seriously ?
by mayqel qunenoS 23 Jan '18

23 Jan '18

Recently, I saw in a sentence written by an expert the {-be'} used on {-lu'}. I won't say who wrote it, nor will I quote the exact sentence, since these details are of no importance. Suffice it to say, that it was on a transitive verb (not that if the verb was intransitive, it would make any difference). So, I was wondering how on earth, this sentence could be correct. If I wrote {Soplu'be'}, then what would this mean ? "not someone unspecified eats" ? And if I want to say "not someone unspecified eats", then why not just write {Sop (subject)} ? I can understand, writing {tu'lu'be'}, since {tu'lu'} is considered to be some kind of "fixed phrase". And I can understand too, that there are indications that a rover applies to the entire word, and not just whatever directly precedes it. But I find it wrong, someone based on the {tu'lu'be'}, and some vague indications with regards to the nature of the rover, to go on and write something like {Soplu'be'}. An expert should write as an expert; unless he/she write only for themselves. But if you are an expert, and are writing something which will be seen and read by other people, then you have to respect the readers and follow the damn rules. Expert is one thing, however *expert*qoq is another. The actions of the individual, determine the category to which he/she belongs. ~ nI'ghma

5 6

nIteb Qaplu'chugh qaq
by mayqel qunenoS 23 Jan '18

23 Jan '18

qaStaHvIS yIn, Do'law' 'op nuv; qay'bogh ghu' bamchugh, chaHvaD reH SaHtaHmo' latlhpu'. 'ej Do'Ha'law' latlhpu', roD nIteb qaDmey bamnISmo'.. 'a, DI'rujvam nuDlu'chugh 'ej nuDlu'taHvIS yeplu'chu'chugh, vaj vItna' tlhojlu'bej.. nIteb Qaplu'chugh qaq.. nIteb vanglu'taHvIS HoSghajchoHlaH, 'ej may' qulmeyDaq qa'Daj mItlhlaH. nIteb vanglu'taHvIS, wuv'eghlu', vaj nenlaH. jatlh tlhInganpu', {jagh DajeymeH, nIteb yISuvrup}. 'ej chaq tlhInganpu' vIpar, 'a mu'tlheghvam vIparHa' 'ej vIHarbej. ~ nI'ghma

1 0