neH after nouns with type 5 suffixes
Can we have {neH} after nouns with type 5 suffixes ? For example: juHlIjDaq neH pegh vI'aghlaH Only at your house I'm able to reveal the secret qunnoq
On 8/7/2017 8:25 AM, mayqel qunenoS wrote:
Can we have {neH} after nouns with type 5 suffixes ?
For example:
juHlIjDaq neH pegh vI'aghlaH Only at your house I'm able to reveal the secret
I don't see why not, though I can't think of any canonical examples. -- SuStel http://trimboli.name
On 7 August 2017 at 15:22, SuStel <sustel@trimboli.name> wrote:
On 8/7/2017 8:25 AM, mayqel qunenoS wrote:
Can we have {neH} after nouns with type 5 suffixes ?
For example:
juHlIjDaq neH pegh vI'aghlaH Only at your house I'm able to reveal the secret
I don't see why not, though I can't think of any canonical examples.
not qoHpu''e' neH ghIjlu'. -- De'vID
muDDaq neH muD Dujmey vorgh lu'orlu', 'ach loghDaq puvlaH Dujmey 'orbogh nuv 'e' 'agh X-wa'maH vagh. [translation not available] (NASM: X-15) Dung qo' pawDI' qeylIS qorDu' je ta''e' neH bop bommey. Upon reaching the upper world, no one could speak of anything, but the deeds of Kahless and his kin. (PB) --Voragh -----Original Message----- On Behalf Of De'vID On 7 August 2017 at 15:22, SuStel <sustel@trimboli.name> wrote:
On 8/7/2017 8:25 AM, mayqel qunenoS wrote:
Can we have {neH} after nouns with type 5 suffixes ?
For example:
juHlIjDaq neH pegh vI'aghlaH Only at your house I'm able to reveal the secret
I don't see why not, though I can't think of any canonical examples.
not qoHpu''e' neH ghIjlu'. -- De'vID _______________________________________________ tlhIngan-Hol mailing list tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
Dung qo' pawDI' qeylIS qorDu' je ta''e' neH bop bommey. Upon reaching the upper world, no one could speak of anything, but the deeds of Kahless and his kin. (PB)
I can't say I understand the addition of {-'e'} on the {ta'}. Because of the {neH}, the meaning is already clear: "no one could speak of *anything but* the deeds". Why add {-'e'} on the {ta'} ? To emphasize the word deeds ? The translation doesn't emphasize the "deeds"; it emphasizes the "anything but". qunnoq On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 4:53 PM, Steven Boozer <sboozer@uchicago.edu> wrote:
muDDaq neH muD Dujmey vorgh lu'orlu', 'ach loghDaq puvlaH Dujmey 'orbogh nuv 'e' 'agh X-wa'maH vagh. [translation not available] (NASM: X-15)
Dung qo' pawDI' qeylIS qorDu' je ta''e' neH bop bommey. Upon reaching the upper world, no one could speak of anything, but the deeds of Kahless and his kin. (PB)
--Voragh
-----Original Message----- On Behalf Of De'vID
On 7 August 2017 at 15:22, SuStel <sustel@trimboli.name> wrote:
On 8/7/2017 8:25 AM, mayqel qunenoS wrote:
Can we have {neH} after nouns with type 5 suffixes ?
For example:
juHlIjDaq neH pegh vI'aghlaH Only at your house I'm able to reveal the secret
I don't see why not, though I can't think of any canonical examples.
not qoHpu''e' neH ghIjlu'.
-- De'vID _______________________________________________ tlhIngan-Hol mailing list tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org _______________________________________________ tlhIngan-Hol mailing list tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 10:56 AM, mayqel qunenoS <mihkoun@gmail.com> wrote:
Dung qo' pawDI' qeylIS qorDu' je ta''e' neH bop bommey. Upon reaching the upper world, no one could speak of anything, but the deeds of Kahless and his kin. (PB)
I can't say I understand the addition of {-'e'} on the {ta'}. Because of the {neH}, the meaning is already clear: "no one could speak of *anything but* the deeds". Why add {-'e'} on the {ta'} ? To emphasize the word deeds ?
To further emphasize the deeds, as opposed to anything else the songs might have been about.
The translation doesn't emphasize the "deeds"; it emphasizes the "anything but".
{neH} isn't inherently emphatic.
participants (5)
-
De'vID -
mayqel qunenoS -
nIqolay Q -
Steven Boozer -
SuStel