Dung qo' pawDI' qeylIS qorDu' je ta''e' neH bop bommey. Upon reaching the upper world, no one could speak of anything, but the deeds of Kahless and his kin. (PB)
I can't say I understand the addition of {-'e'} on the {ta'}. Because of the {neH}, the meaning is already clear: "no one could speak of *anything but* the deeds". Why add {-'e'} on the {ta'} ? To emphasize the word deeds ? The translation doesn't emphasize the "deeds"; it emphasizes the "anything but". qunnoq On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 4:53 PM, Steven Boozer <sboozer@uchicago.edu> wrote:
muDDaq neH muD Dujmey vorgh lu'orlu', 'ach loghDaq puvlaH Dujmey 'orbogh nuv 'e' 'agh X-wa'maH vagh. [translation not available] (NASM: X-15)
Dung qo' pawDI' qeylIS qorDu' je ta''e' neH bop bommey. Upon reaching the upper world, no one could speak of anything, but the deeds of Kahless and his kin. (PB)
--Voragh
-----Original Message----- On Behalf Of De'vID
On 7 August 2017 at 15:22, SuStel <sustel@trimboli.name> wrote:
On 8/7/2017 8:25 AM, mayqel qunenoS wrote:
Can we have {neH} after nouns with type 5 suffixes ?
For example:
juHlIjDaq neH pegh vI'aghlaH Only at your house I'm able to reveal the secret
I don't see why not, though I can't think of any canonical examples.
not qoHpu''e' neH ghIjlu'.
-- De'vID _______________________________________________ tlhIngan-Hol mailing list tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org _______________________________________________ tlhIngan-Hol mailing list tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org