19 Feb
2019
19 Feb
'19
5:53 p.m.
On 2/19/2019 7:38 PM, Daniel Dadap wrote:
On Feb 19, 2019, at 08:32, SuStel<sustel@trimboli.name> wrote:
HIpwIj vItuQ'eghmoH I find this example interesting because it violates the rule of type one verb suffixes requiring a no object prefix.
You're right; I probably goofed with that one. It probably needs to be *jIHvaD HIpwIj vItuQmoH.* I think there's canon of another violation like this, but I don't want to go claiming it's definitely allowed. I don't remember what the canon is, though. -- SuStel http://trimboli.name