On Feb 19, 2019, at 08:32, SuStel <sustel@trimboli.name> wrote:

HIpwIj vItuQ'eghmoH

I find this example interesting because it violates the rule of type one verb suffixes requiring a no object prefix.

You're right; I probably goofed with that one. It probably needs to be jIHvaD HIpwIj vItuQmoH.

I think there's canon of another violation like this, but I don't want to go claiming it's definitely allowed. I don't remember what the canon is, though.

-- 
SuStel
http://trimboli.name