Wow. Just wow. That’s pretty vindictive. Impressively so. You seem to be responding to someone who claims more authority than I intend to. I’m just giving my opinion. All I was saying was that if you want to prove that we need a word we don’t have, you didn’t work very hard to create that proof. That’s it. I don’t think that deserves this degree of venom. But if you like venom, go for it. No skin off my nose. I’m going on a walk with my wife and my granddaughter. Much better company. charghwI’ vaghnerya’ngan rInpa’ bomnIS be’’a’ pI’.
On Mar 15, 2019, at 8:40 AM, mayqel qunen'oS <mihkoun@gmail.com> wrote:
charghwI':
The reason I said it was a half effort
Can you quote where exactly, I suggested that we use {Hur} in order to describe the exterior surface of something ?
I asked, whether it *could* be used that way. Asking is one thing, while suggesting is quite another.
And let me ask you; why don't you react similarly when people transliterate, or crap repeatedly on the "not using -Daq unless it is placed on a physical location" rule ?
Don't these people suggest indirectly, that we *should* transliterate, and break the -Daq rule ?
And as far as whether I think that a word meaning "outer surface" is necessary, yes I do. And it's my right, as it is the right of every tlhIngan Hol fan to have his own wish list.
But has okrand EVER reacted the way YOU did/usually do, when a fan asks for something which he doesn't think is necessary ?
Luckily no. Because if okrand chose to reply the way you do, soon the only person who would be using klingon, would be only okrand.
~ changan qIj
_______________________________________________ tlhIngan-Hol mailing list tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org