Wow.  

Just wow.

That’s pretty vindictive. Impressively so.

You seem to be responding to someone who claims more authority than I intend to. I’m just giving my opinion.

All I was saying was that if you want to prove that we need a word we don’t have, you didn’t work very hard to create that proof. 

That’s it.

I don’t think that deserves this degree of venom.

But if you like venom, go for it. No skin off my nose. I’m going on a walk with my wife and my granddaughter. Much better company.

charghwI’ vaghnerya’ngan

rInpa’ bomnIS be’’a’ pI’.

On Mar 15, 2019, at 8:40 AM, mayqel qunen'oS <mihkoun@gmail.com> wrote:

charghwI':
> The reason I said it was a half effort

Can you quote where exactly, I suggested that we use {Hur} in order to describe the exterior surface of something ?

I asked, whether it *could* be used that way. Asking is one thing, while suggesting is quite another.

And let me ask you; why don't you react similarly when people transliterate, or crap repeatedly on the "not using -Daq unless it is placed on a physical location" rule ?

Don't these people suggest indirectly, that we *should* transliterate, and break the -Daq rule ?

And as far as whether I think that a word meaning "outer surface" is necessary, yes I do. And it's my right, as it is the right of every tlhIngan Hol fan to have his own wish list.

But has okrand EVER reacted the way YOU did/usually do, when a fan asks for something which he doesn't think is necessary ?

Luckily no. Because if okrand chose to reply the way you do, soon the only person who would be using klingon, would be only okrand.

~ changan qIj

_______________________________________________
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org