15 Feb
2019
15 Feb
'19
12:10 p.m.
On 2/15/2019 12:04 PM, Steven Boozer wrote:
Or you could replace the first {‘e’} with a noun: { chomaghta' ‘ej ta’lIj / ta’vam vIlIj ‘e’ DapIH'a'? } I also like that the verb suffix {-ta’} is echoed by the noun {ta’}.
*maghta'ghachlIj vIlIj 'e' DapIH'a'?* You just lose the "of me" part of the betrayal. Presumably it would be understood in context. If not, you could put the *chomaghta'* as a separate sentence first. There is no rule barring multiply connected sentences-as-objects, but there's no evidence for them either. -- SuStel http://trimboli.name