Or you could replace the first {‘e’} with a noun:  { chomaghta'  ‘ej ta’lIj / ta’vam vIlIj ‘e’ DapIH'a'? }  I also like that the verb suffix {-ta’} is echoed by the noun {ta’}.

maghta'ghachlIj vIlIj 'e' DapIH'a'?

You just lose the "of me" part of the betrayal. Presumably it would be understood in context. If not, you could put the chomaghta' as a separate sentence first.

There is no rule barring multiply connected sentences-as-objects, but there's no evidence for them either.

-- 
SuStel
http://trimboli.name