Interesting. I should have included the original text. This is what Kotar and Molor Have said to Kahless In the hours before battle. I would have assumed a {qaStaHvIS} construction here. QImSIr On Thursday, January 5, 2017, <sustel@trimboli.name> wrote:
Indeed. Is it an emphasized time stamp? Is it a topic? Is it both?
Notice also the evidence that the object of *ja’ *is the thing said and not the person it's said to.
-- SuStel http://trimboli.name
*From: *Brian Cote <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','wearetheinformation00@gmail.com');> *Sent: *Wednesday, January 4, 2017 8:04 PM *To: *tlhingan-hol@kli.org <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','tlhingan-hol@kli.org');> *Subject: *[tlhIngan Hol] Interesting time stamp
No big question here, but I came across this time stamp in the paq'batlh and found it very interesting.
paq'raD 14:19-21
may' lunungbogh repmey'e'
qeylISvaD mu'meyvam
ja'ta' molor qotar je
QImSIr