15 Mar
2022
15 Mar
'22
9:49 a.m.
jIH:
boghmoHtaHvIS be'pu' Qanbogh Qun'e' SuStel: I suspect you're also imagining the be'pu' as both the subject of boghmoHtaHvIS and the object of Qanbogh. it can only be one, and the other has to be an elided chaH.
Yes, that was my intention exactly! But why can't it be both the subject of {boghmoHtaHvIS} and the object of {Qanbogh}? Is there any rule which forbids it? -- Dana'an https://sacredtextsinklingon.wordpress.com/ Ζεὺς ἦν, Ζεὺς ἐστίν, Ζεὺς ἔσσεται· ὦ μεγάλε Ζεῦ