jIH:
> boghmoHtaHvIS be'pu' Qanbogh Qun'e'
SuStel:> I suspect you're also imagining the be'pu'
> as both the subject of boghmoHtaHvIS
> and the object of Qanbogh. it can only be
> one, and the other has to be an elided
> chaH.
Yes, that was my intention exactly! But why can't it be both the subject of {boghmoHtaHvIS} and the object of {Qanbogh}? Is there any rule which forbids it?