On 12/13/2019 11:58 AM, mayqel qunen'oS wrote:
We know we can say:
qagh (lu)Sop 'op some eat qagh
(I don't know whether {'op} is to be treated as grammatically singular or plural.. If someone knows, please enlighten me..)
But I wonder, whether it'd be correct to say:
qagh luSop 'op puS few eat qagh
I can't see anything grammatically wrong with it, (although qeylIS knows, I don't know jack qeQ when it comes to grammar..).
But I can't stop wondering, whether it actually makes sense..
Does it make sense? Maybe. Not sure. I don't like all the experiments people do with *'op,* apparently with English or some other language in mind. Is it valid? Dunno. Try *qagh luSop ghot puS* /Few people eat qagh, /*qagh luSop ghot puS Dep puS je*/Few people or beings eat qagh,/ or maybe even *qagh luSop puSwI'*/Those who are few eat qagh/ (though this one wouldn't be my first choice). Or *motlhHa' qagh Soplu'*/Qagh is not usually eaten,/ *pIjHa' qagh Soplu'*/Qagh is eaten infrequently,/ *qagh SopwI' puS law' qagh SopQo'wI' puS puS*/Qagh eaters are fewer than qagh non-eaters./ -- SuStel http://trimboli.name