SuStel:
yapbe' *HIja' ghobe'* joq.
this is rather strange, since I was careful to write QAO's utilizing simple substitutions, the kinds of which we had discussed that are acceptable. oh well ! seemingly I will never know the answer, and curiosity will be troubling me each day.. thank qeylIS I'm not a cat, because if I was one this curiosity would be the end of me ! and the above in klingon.. 'ej DaH, tlhIngan mu'mey moj mu'mey vorgh.. Huj.. QAOmey vIghItlhmeH mu'tlhegh nap vIghItlhta', pab nap lulo'bogh mu'tlhegh: mu'tlheghmeyvamDaq ghelmeH mu' qa'laH jangmeH mu'. mIw wIlajlaHbogh vIlo'ta'. qay'be'.. jIHvaD janglaw' pagh, 'ej meqvammo', qaStaHvIS Hoch jaj jISIvtaH. vIghro' jIHbe'mo', qeylIS vItlho' ! vIghro' jIH net jalchugh vaj reH jIghel'eghmo' jIHeghbej ! qunnoH jan puqloD ghoghwIj HablI'vo' vIngeHta' On 30 Nov 2016 4:14 pm, "SuStel" <sustel@trimboli.name> wrote:
On 11/30/2016 3:08 AM, mayqel qunenoS wrote:
are these QAO's correct ?
jIjang rIntaH. yapbe' *HIja' ghobe'* joq. chaq Dujangqang je latlh nuv.
-- SuStelhttp://trimboli.name
_______________________________________________ tlhIngan-Hol mailing list tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org