SuStel:
> yapbe' HIja' ghobe' joq.
this is rather strange, since I was careful to write QAO's utilizing simple substitutions, the kinds of which we had discussed that are acceptable.
oh well ! seemingly I will never know the answer, and curiosity will be troubling me each day.. thank qeylIS I'm not a cat, because if I was one this curiosity would be the end of me !
and the above in klingon..
'ej DaH, tlhIngan mu'mey moj mu'mey vorgh..
Huj.. QAOmey vIghItlhmeH mu'tlhegh nap vIghItlhta', pab nap lulo'bogh mu'tlhegh: mu'tlheghmeyvamDaq ghelmeH mu' qa'laH jangmeH mu'. mIw wIlajlaHbogh vIlo'ta'.
qay'be'.. jIHvaD janglaw' pagh, 'ej meqvammo', qaStaHvIS Hoch jaj jISIvtaH. vIghro' jIHbe'mo', qeylIS vItlho' ! vIghro' jIH net jalchugh vaj reH jIghel'eghmo' jIHeghbej !
qunnoH jan puqloD
ghoghwIj HablI'vo' vIngeHta'
On 11/30/2016 3:08 AM, mayqel qunenoS wrote:
are these QAO's correct ?
jIjang rIntaH. yapbe' HIja' ghobe' joq. chaq Dujangqang je latlh nuv.
-- SuStel http://trimboli.name
_______________________________________________
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org