SuStel:
> yapbe' HIja' ghobe' joq.

this is rather strange, since I was careful to write QAO's utilizing simple substitutions, the kinds of which we had discussed that are acceptable.

oh well ! seemingly I will never know the answer, and curiosity will be troubling me each day.. thank qeylIS I'm not a cat, because if I was one this curiosity would be the end of me !

and the above in klingon..
'ej DaH, tlhIngan mu'mey moj mu'mey vorgh..

Huj.. QAOmey vIghItlhmeH mu'tlhegh nap vIghItlhta', pab nap lulo'bogh mu'tlhegh:  mu'tlheghmeyvamDaq ghelmeH mu' qa'laH jangmeH mu'. mIw wIlajlaHbogh vIlo'ta'.

qay'be'.. jIHvaD janglaw' pagh, 'ej meqvammo', qaStaHvIS Hoch jaj jISIvtaH. vIghro' jIHbe'mo', qeylIS vItlho' ! vIghro' jIH net jalchugh vaj reH jIghel'eghmo' jIHeghbej !

qunnoH jan puqloD
ghoghwIj HablI'vo' vIngeHta'


On 30 Nov 2016 4:14 pm, "SuStel" <sustel@trimboli.name> wrote:
On 11/30/2016 3:08 AM, mayqel qunenoS wrote:
are these QAO's correct ?

jIjang rIntaH. yapbe' HIja' ghobe' joq. chaq Dujangqang  je latlh nuv.

-- 
SuStel
http://trimboli.name

_______________________________________________
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org