Re: [tlhIngan Hol] {-bogh} {-bogh}'ed nouns and {-taHvIS}

SuStel:

Here is a phrase that CANNOT be a noun phrase: boghmoHtaHvIS be'pu'. That's not a noun phrase; it's only a subordinate clause. So since boghmoHtaHvIS be'pu' is not a noun phrase, it cannot be the object of Qonbogh Qun'e'. If it is not the object, it must be atttached to the relative clause as a subordinate clause.

Ok, now I understand. I see now where my confusion started. Thank you SuStel, charghwI', and fergusq for taking the time to reply. -- Dana'an https://sacredtextsinklingon.wordpress.com/ Ζεὺς ἦν, Ζεὺς ἐστίν, Ζεὺς ἔσσεται· ὦ μεγάλε Ζεῦ