> Here is a phrase that CANNOT be a noun

> phrase: boghmoHtaHvIS be'pu'. That's

> not a noun phrase; it's only a subordinate

> clause. So since boghmoHtaHvIS be'pu'

> is not a noun phrase, it cannot be the

> object of Qonbogh Qun'e'. If it is not the

> object, it must be atttached to the relative

> clause as a subordinate clause.

Ok, now I understand. I see now where my confusion started.

Thank you SuStel, charghwI', and fergusq for taking the time to reply.