This still makes sense. If it is a time stamp, saying *may' lunungbogh repmey**'e'* is identifying which hours are the time context of the main action (the telling). This is still of the point-to-it-on-a-timeline variety. You /could/ use *qaStaHvIS,* but that probably wouldn't have met the constraints of the poetic form. On 1/5/2017 12:38 PM, Brian Cote wrote:
Interesting.
I should have included the original text.
This is what Kotar and Molor Have said to Kahless In the hours before battle.
I would have assumed a {qaStaHvIS} construction here.
QImSIr
On Thursday, January 5, 2017, <sustel@trimboli.name <mailto:sustel@trimboli.name>> wrote:
Indeed. Is it an emphasized time stamp? Is it a topic? Is it both?
Notice also the evidence that the object of *ja’ *is the thing said and not the person it's said to.
-- SuStel http://trimboli.name
*From: *Brian Cote <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','wearetheinformation00@gmail.com');> *Sent: *Wednesday, January 4, 2017 8:04 PM *To: *tlhingan-hol@kli.org <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','tlhingan-hol@kli.org');> *Subject: *[tlhIngan Hol] Interesting time stamp
No big question here, but I came across this time stamp in the paq'batlh and found it very interesting.
paq'raD 14:19-21
may' lunungbogh repmey'e'
qeylISvaD mu'meyvam
ja'ta' molor qotar je
QImSIr
_______________________________________________ tlhIngan-Hol mailing list tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
-- SuStel http://trimboli.name