This still makes sense. If it is a time stamp, saying may' lunungbogh repmey'e' is identifying which hours are the time context of the main action (the telling). This is still of the point-to-it-on-a-timeline variety.
You could use qaStaHvIS, but that probably
wouldn't have met the constraints of the poetic form.
Interesting.
I should have included the original text.
This is what Kotar and MolorHave said to KahlessIn the hours before battle.I would have assumed a {qaStaHvIS} construction here.
QImSIr
On Thursday, January 5, 2017, <sustel@trimboli.name> wrote:
Indeed. Is it an emphasized time stamp? Is it a topic? Is it both?
Notice also the evidence that the object of ja’ is the thing said and not the person it's said to.
--
SuStel
http://trimboli.name
From: Brian Cote
Sent: Wednesday, January 4, 2017 8:04 PM
To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Subject: [tlhIngan Hol] Interesting time stamp
No big question here, but I came across this time stamp in the paq'batlh and found it very interesting.
paq'raD 14:19-21
may' lunungbogh repmey'e'
qeylISvaD mu'meyvam
ja'ta' molor qotar je
QImSIr
_______________________________________________ tlhIngan-Hol mailing list tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
-- SuStel http://trimboli.name