Read : {ghogh HablI'wIj jIH vIngaQHa'moHmeH, jIHDaq yay vIwev} Would you understand, what I hope you would ? ~ m. qunen'oS I love you maltz
Read :
{ghogh HablI'wIj jIH vIngaQHa'moHmeH, jIHDaq yay vIwev}
Would you understand, what I hope you would ?
Makes sense to me, but the {yay} seems redundant: {jIHDaq jIwev} is probably sufficient. Also, this is just a personal preference, but I prefer {QumwI'} to describe the type of {ghogh HablI'} on which such a thing is possible. jIQummeH pIj janvam vIlo'taH. vabDot DaH vIlo'taH. 'a pIjHa' ghogh lI' pagh Hev QummeH janwIj. wejmaH vagh ben narghpu' tlhIngan Hol mu'ghom. ngugh ghogh janmey neH bIHtaH ghogh HablI'mey. jIHmey Hutlh, vaj jIHDaq wevlaHbe' vay'. 'a DaH QubchoHbej ghogh HablI'meyvam nap.
On Sun, Apr 28, 2019, 18:02 Daniel Dadap, <daniel@dadap.net> wrote:
Read :
{ghogh HablI'wIj jIH vIngaQHa'moHmeH, jIHDaq yay vIwev}
Would you understand, what I hope you would ?
Makes sense to me, but the {yay} seems redundant: {jIHDaq jIwev} is probably sufficient.
bISuDrup'a'? yay Dachavbe'. -- De'vID
De'nIl:
{yay} seems redundant: {jIHDaq jIwev} is
probably sufficient.
True. I hadn't thought of that. De'nIl:
Also, this is just a personal preference
but I prefer {QumwI'} to describe the type
of {ghogh HablI'} on which such a thing is
possible.
True again. I think we'd discussed this on twitter too. I agree with the fact that nowdays, a phone is much much more than a simple "transmitter of voice". But the problem which would worry me, is in case I didn't use {ghogh HablI'}, and choose {QumwI'}, {toch De'wI'}, or anything similar, perhaps the reader wouldn't be able to understand that it is a phone I'm actually talking about. ~ m. qunen'oS In the name of tkd, kgt, and tkw; amen.
On Apr 28, 2019, at 12:15, mayqel qunen'oS <mihkoun@gmail.com> wrote:
in case I didn't use {ghogh HablI'}, and choose {QumwI'}, {toch De'wI'}, or anything similar, perhaps the reader wouldn't be able to understand that it is a phone I'm actually talking about.
Both of those are clearer than {Hoqra'}, which I’ve also seen people use, but understood in context to mean a smartphone. Also, I realized there was a typo in my earlier message. I meant {qubchoH ghogh HablI'mey nap}, not {QubchoH}. It wasn’t intended as a commentary on AI.
On Apr 28, 2019, at 11:41 AM, mayqel qunen'oS <mihkoun@gmail.com> wrote:
Read : {ghogh HablI'wIj jIH vIngaQHa'moHmeH, jIHDaq yay vIwev} Would you understand, what I hope you would ?
jIyajbe' jIH. ghIq ja'lu' «ngutlh». vaj jIyajchoHlaw'. If you’re saying that you draw victory, I have no clue what that means. If you’re trying to say that you draw a letter on the screen, you didn’t quite get that idea expressed clearly. {yay} refers to the *sound* represented by the {y} symbol. I would have understood {<y> vIwev} or {yay ngutlh vIwev} without difficulty. -- ghunchu'wI'
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 2:57 PM Alan Anderson <qunchuy@alcaco.net> wrote:
On Apr 28, 2019, at 11:41 AM, mayqel qunen'oS <mihkoun@gmail.com> wrote:
Read :
{ghogh HablI'wIj jIH vIngaQHa'moHmeH, jIHDaq yay vIwev}
Would you understand, what I hope you would ?
jIyajbe' jIH. ghIq ja'lu' «ngutlh». vaj jIyajchoHlaw'.
If you’re saying that you draw victory, I have no clue what that means.
If you’re trying to say that you draw a letter on the screen, you didn’t quite get that idea expressed clearly. {yay} refers to the *sound* represented by the {y} symbol. I would have understood {<y> vIwev} or {yay ngutlh vIwev} without difficulty.
{yay} is a new noun meaning something like "scribble, doodle". It's the result when you {wev} something that's not easily identifiable.
On Apr 29, 2019, at 13:00, Alan Anderson <qunchuy@alcaco.net> wrote:
jIyajbe' jIH. ghIq ja'lu' «ngutlh». vaj jIyajchoHlaw'.
If you’re saying that you draw victory, I have no clue what that means.
ngutlh yay QapwI' yay joq rIchbe'. wevwI' yay rIch: http://lists.kli.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol-kli.org/2018-October/008872.html mu' «ngutlh» vIlo'pu', jIqID vIneHpu'mo' neH:
chaq yay vIchavchugh yay yay vIwev. vabDot vIwevmeH ngutlh yay tu'qom vIlo'. yay yay yay 'oH.
qID DayajmeH wej «yay» jIyweS tIqel: 1) QapmeH wanI' 2) «yay» taghbogh 'ej rInmoHbogh ngutlh 3) mIllogh ghIH wevlu'bogh SIbI'Ha' qID vIDubta'. naDev qID vIDubta'bogh tu'laH vay': https://twitter.com/dapdaptuq/status/1122541647571619840
participants (5)
-
Alan Anderson -
Daniel Dadap -
De'vID -
mayqel qunen'oS -
nIqolay Q