Re: [tlhIngan Hol] What would you understand if..

De'nIl:

{yay} seems redundant: {jIHDaq jIwev} is 

probably sufficient.

True. I hadn't thought of that. De'nIl:

Also, this is just a personal preference 

but I prefer {QumwI'} to describe the type 

of {ghogh HablI'} on which such a thing is 

possible.

True again. I think we'd discussed this on twitter too. I agree with the fact that nowdays, a phone is much much more than a simple "transmitter of voice". But the problem which would worry me, is in case I didn't use {ghogh HablI'}, and choose {QumwI'}, {toch De'wI'}, or anything similar, perhaps the reader wouldn't be able to understand that it is a phone I'm actually talking about. ~ m. qunen'oS In the name of tkd, kgt, and tkw; amen.