poH ngaj ret, souvlakia vIje'meH jIve'taH ('elaDya'ngan jIHmo', pIj souvlakia vISop); 'ej jIve'taHvIS.. I made an important realization. I knew that if we want to add two adverbs to a noun we had the following ways: ngIngbogh HoS nIt nItbogh HoS ngIng ngIngbogh 'et nItbogh HoS nItbogh 'ej ngIngbogh HoS ngIngbogh HoS 'ej nItbogh nItbogh HoS 'ej ngIngbogh All good.. but what if these methods failed to convey the feeling I was aiming for ? lets assume I want to say: "pure negative energy I summon thee" no method of the above is able to convey the exceptional dark "punch" of the english original. none. 'ej souvlakiawIj vISamtaHvIS, luckily I realized that the solution was easy: {HoS nIt, HoS ngIng qarIt}. Perhaps it is just a matter of personal preference, but I feel that the last method better conveys the feeling of the moment, let alone that it is more direct than "energy which is this and that go figure". Of course the question arises: In the {HoS nIt, HoS ngIng qarIt} is it legal to use the {qa-} ? ok, here you got me.. I don't know for sure, but if: a. each of the {HoS nIt} {HoS ngIng} are to be considered to be forms of address, and b. they address the same thing (which is "one") then why not use the {qa-} ? maj ! DaH souvlakiameywIj vISop. qunnoH ghoghwIj HablI'vo' vIngeHta'
On 11/25/2016 3:28 PM, mayqel qunenoS wrote:
I knew that if we want to add two adverbs to a noun we had the following ways:
ngIngbogh HoS nIt nItbogh HoS ngIng ngIngbogh 'et nItbogh HoS nItbogh 'ej ngIngbogh HoS ngIngbogh HoS 'ej nItbogh nItbogh HoS 'ej ngIngbogh
All good.. but what if these methods failed to convey the feeling I was aiming for ?
lets assume I want to say: "pure negative energy I summon thee"
no method of the above is able to convey the exceptional dark "punch" of the english original. none.
'ej souvlakiawIj vISamtaHvIS, luckily I realized that the solution was easy:
{HoS nIt, HoS ngIng qarIt}.
I think you meant two adjectival verbs, not two adverbs. The problem in feeling is that in English "pure, negative energy" probably isn't what you mean. Do you actually mean "pure energy, negative energy," or do you mean "purely negative energy"? Is it the energy that is pure or the negativity? *ngIngchu'bogh HoS, qarIt.* -- SuStel http://trimboli.name
... ngIng ... ... convey the exceptional dark "punch" of the english original.
ngIng - have a negative charge A science type of term, given to us the same time we got "electron" and "proton". But then you talk about "dark". Are you using ngIng/"negative charge" to imply evil, bad, the dark side of the force? - DloraH
SuStel:
I think you meant two adjectival verbs, not two adverbs.
oh yes ! you're right. SuStel:
The problem in feeling is that in English "pure,
negative energy" probably isn't what you
mean. Do you actually mean "pure energy,
negative energy," or do you mean "purely
negative energy"? Is it the energy that is pure
or the negativity?
It is the energy that is at the same time pure and negative. Both the "pure" and the "negative" refer to the energy, and are used to describe it. The way I see it (correct me if I am wrong), is that the way I described is equivalent to saying: {SuStel po', jupwI' QaQ, qatlho'} expert SuStel, my good friend, thank you the "thank you" refers to the one same person (and because if this reason we use the {qa-}), and the {SuStel}, {jupwI'}, {po'} and {QaQ} describe the same person too. DloraH:
Are you using ngIng/"negative charge" to imply evil, bad, the dark side of the force?
yes, that was the intention. and you're right; I should have used {mIgh} or {Hurgh} instead. But - may the canon master forgive me - I chose to use {ngIng} because I wanted to directly translate the word "negative". qunnoH ghoghwIj HablI'vo' vIngeHta' On 26 Nov 2016 3:10 am, "DloraH" <seruq@bellsouth.net> wrote:
... ngIng ... ... convey the exceptional dark "punch" of the english original.
ngIng - have a negative charge A science type of term, given to us the same time we got "electron" and "proton". But then you talk about "dark". Are you using ngIng/"negative charge" to imply evil, bad, the dark side of the force?
- DloraH
_______________________________________________ tlhIngan-Hol mailing list tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
participants (3)
-
DloraH -
mayqel qunenoS -
SuStel