On 11/30/2017 2:12 PM, Aurélie Demonchaux wrote:
Today I am trying to grasp the difference between {net + verb} and {'e' + verb-lu'}
The way I understand it is, for example with "Sov"
net Sov = it is common knowledge that 'e' Sovlu' = someone (indefinite) knows that
Thus: qama'pu' DIHoHbe' net Sov = It is common knowledge that we don't kill prisoners qama'pu' DIHoHbe' 'e' Sovlu' = It is known / someone knows that we don't kill prisoners
Similarly with chaw' : qama'pu' DIHoH net chaw'be' = we are not allowed to kill prisoners qama'pu' DIHoH 'e' chaw'lu'be' = someone does not allow us to kill prisoners
Am I getting it right ?
My first attempt to answer this never arrived. The "common knowledge" idea was invented by Klingonists' usage; it is not canonical. Back in the early *qep'a'mey,* it was a running gag to say *net Sov, net Sov!* in part because Captain Krankor's imperial anthem uses that in a line. There is no semantic difference between *net *X and *'e'* X*lu',* except that the latter is supposed to be ungrammatical. The rules say that, except for the recent exception with *'aq,* one uses *net* when the subject of the second sentence is indefinite, not *'e' *X*-lu'.* Okrand breaks this rule occasionally, and when and why one can break the rule is unknown. I believe he breaks the rule for the same reason I do sometimes: it's easy to forget to use *net.* I think he does it in error. Of course, if he ever decided to explain what's going on, he'll invent some reason why all the examples we have of apparent rules-violations are actually special cases, and here's what's REALLY going on, and that'll be that. -- SuStel http://trimboli.name