21 May
2020
21 May
'20
8:51 a.m.
On 5/21/2020 7:31 AM, mayqel qunen'oS wrote:
As far as the {jatlhchuq} is concerned, again I realize that there is no Ca'Non to support it, but if we *can* say {qajatlhpu' HIghoS}, then why couldn't we say too {majatlhchuqpu'..} Although, now that I'm thinking this over, I don't know whether we've actually seen any Ca'Non using the prefix trick with {jatlh}, so perhaps this all approach has been wrong from the start.
We have. The canonical word is *qajatlh.* http://klingonska.org/canon/search/?file=1997-06-29a-news.txt&q=qajatlh -- SuStel http://trimboli.name