Thanks De'vID, for explaining that to me. And you're right, I mixed up a few things. It was late, sorry. Am 20.01.2024 um 22:35 schrieb De'vID:
has nothing to do with {Dam}, whereas the latter does. Also, did you mean {SuvwI'} rather than {'urwI'}? It's dangerous to say the latter when you mean the former.
{SoHvaD 'urwI' vIDam} or {SoHvaD 'urwI' qaDam} ?
{SoHvaD SuvwI' vIDam} is correct. We have the canon example of {HumanvaD 'urwI' wIDam}.
Yes, but from that example, the object of {wI-} was not 100% clear, which is what made me feel unsure.
{SuvwI' qaDam} should also work, using the prefix trick applied to the above.
I guess that's what I had in mind.
What is the object of the verb {Dam}?
The thing that the subject is treating as being applicable or as though it were true.
Great! I'll add that to my notes, i.e. the Klingon wiki.
{SoHvaD SuvwI' vIDam} "I consider (treat somebody like) a warrior; you the the beneficiary of my doing so" > "I treat you as a warrior"
{SuvwI' SoH 'e' vIDam} "I view the statement to be applicable or true, that you are a warrior" > "I consider you to be a warrior"
-- Lieven L. Litaer aka the "Klingon Teacher from Germany" http://www.tlhInganHol.com http://klingon.wiki/En/AliceInWonderland