15 Aug
2017
15 Aug
'17
3:55 a.m.
The word HochHom is well known' HochHom may mean:- - N:[most|greater_part]= - N:all NS1:diminutive i.e. "small all". Is there any chance for what seems to me to be a logical opposite to it?:- pagh'a' pagh'a' may mean:- - N:nothing NS1:augmentative - N:no_one= NS1:augmentative - I:0 VS9:interrogative - I:0 NS1:augmentative I was tempted to suggest it to ask Marc Okrand about using pagh'a' as "big nothing", i.e. "next to nothing", "very little", "not enough to be of use".