The word HochHom is well known'<br><br>HochHom may mean:-<br>- N:[most|greater_part]=<br>- N:all NS1:diminutive<br><br>i.e. "small all".<br><br>Is there any chance for what seems to me to be a logical opposite to it?:-<br><br>pagh'a'<br><br>pagh'a' may mean:-<br>- N:nothing NS1:augmentative<br>- N:no_one= NS1:augmentative<br>- I:0 VS9:interrogative<br>- I:0 NS1:augmentative<br><br>I was tempted to suggest it to ask Marc Okrand about using pagh'a' as "big nothing", i.e. "next to nothing", "very little", "not enough to be of use".<br><br><p></p>