http://klingonska.org/ref/time.html:
The second system is an informal way of answering the question ’arlogh Qoylu’pu’? jIH: The problem here is whether the sentence "The second system is an informal way of answering the question {’arlogh Qoylu’pu’?}", was indeed in HQ, and of course whether it was written by 'oqranD himself.
On the other hand, even if this sentence *is* indeed Ca'Non, one could wonder.. For something to be considered informal, logically something else must exist, something else which is considered to be formal. If the {'arlogh Qoylu'pu'} existed looong before anything else, then how the jay' can it be considered informal ? How can it be considered informal if there was nothing else to compare it to ? The more I think of it, the more everything points to the {'arlogh Qoylu'pu'} being the formal/traditional method of telling time. ~ Qa'yIn