among the various time telling methods is there a formal one
I've been going through the various time telling methods. method #1: (from: "maltz online", HolQeD 8:1, pages 7-12) tera' rep loS wejmaH "Earth hour 4:30" method #2: (same source) cha'logh Qoylu'pu'. method #3: (Eurotalk TalkNow! Klingon) Five to twelve (11:55) a.m. wa'maH wa'vatlh vaghmaH vagh rep 11:55 p.m. (23:55) cha'maH wejvatlh vaghmaH vagh rep As far as the first two methods are concerned, I read okrand's explanation with regards to when they are to be used and/or how and why each method originated. Strangely though, I didn't see in the eurotalk any description as to when this specific method of telling time is to be used, or how it originated in the first place. Which brings me to the question of this post.. Among the various time telling methods, is there a method which is supposed to be used in more formal settings than the rest ? And when I say "formal settings" I mean weddings, court trials, religious texts, etc. ~ Qa'yIn
jIH:
Among the various time telling methods, is there a method which is supposed to be used in more formal settings than the rest ? And when I say "formal settings" I mean weddings, court trials, religious texts, etc.
There's something I realized, which perhaps answers this matter. In "'maltz online', HolQeD 8:1, pages 7-12", it says:
In dealing with time in interplanetary communication, Klingons have come to use the 24-hour system favored by the Federation.
And later, during the description of the {'arlogh Qoy'lu'pu'} method, it says in reference to this method:
in a time before Klingons traveled around the galaxy
Given that weddings, court trials (of any kind), and religious texts were probably taking place/were probably written before klingons started travelling in space (I can't believe I'm writing this crap..), then logically, the formal/traditional method seems to be the {'arlogh Qoy'lu'pu'}. The only thing which doesn't seem to fit in all this, is something which I read at: http://klingonska.org/ref/time.html There, it says:
In HolQeD 8:1 (March 1999) two different ways of telling the time were described. The first system, used for interplanetary communication, is exemplified in the following phrases (if the context is clear, the word tera’ Earth may be left out, as in the last example below): tera’ rep wa’ Earth hour one or one o’clock tera’ rep cha’maH Earth hour 20 or 20 o’clock or eight o’clock p.m. tera’ rep loS wejmaH Earth hour 4:30 rep cha’maH 20 o’clock, eight o’clock p.m. The second system is an informal way of answering the question ’arlogh Qoylu’pu’? What time is it? (lit. How many times has it been heard?) In direct response to this question one may even drop the verb, and answer only chorghlogh eight o’clock (lit. eight times). cha’logh Qoylu’pu’ It’s two o’clock chorghlogh Qoylu’pu’ It’s eight o’clock
The problem here is whether the sentence "The second system is an informal way of answering the question {’arlogh Qoylu’pu’?}", was indeed in HQ, and of course whether it was written by 'oqranD himself. Let alone the fact, that according to that sentence, the thing which actually is informal, isn't the question itself, but the "way of answering to it". And the sentence in question doesn't clarify whether the "informal way of answering" concerns only the answers where the verb is dropped (e.g saying just {chorghlogh}), or whether it has to do with the entire {chorghlogh Qoylu’pu’} sentence. Anyways, since I don't have the original HQ, I can't know for sure what's actually going on, but unless there's some other Ca'Non I'm missing, then for the time being I'll accept the {'arlogh Qoylu'pu'} as the formal/traditional method of telling time. ~ Qa'yIn
http://klingonska.org/ref/time.html:
The second system is an informal way of answering the question ’arlogh Qoylu’pu’? jIH: The problem here is whether the sentence "The second system is an informal way of answering the question {’arlogh Qoylu’pu’?}", was indeed in HQ, and of course whether it was written by 'oqranD himself.
On the other hand, even if this sentence *is* indeed Ca'Non, one could wonder.. For something to be considered informal, logically something else must exist, something else which is considered to be formal. If the {'arlogh Qoylu'pu'} existed looong before anything else, then how the jay' can it be considered informal ? How can it be considered informal if there was nothing else to compare it to ? The more I think of it, the more everything points to the {'arlogh Qoylu'pu'} being the formal/traditional method of telling time. ~ Qa'yIn
Why assume that tradition is formal? Bib overalls and blue jeans are traditional clothing. Tuxedos are formal. Twelve hundred hours is formal. Noon is a much older, more traditional description of midday. Sent from my iPad
On Jul 29, 2020, at 4:59 AM, mayqel qunen'oS <mihkoun@gmail.com> wrote:
http://klingonska.org/ref/time.html:
The second system is an informal way of answering the question ’arlogh Qoylu’pu’? jIH: The problem here is whether the sentence "The second system is an informal way of answering the question {’arlogh Qoylu’pu’?}", was indeed in HQ, and of course whether it was written by 'oqranD himself.
On the other hand, even if this sentence *is* indeed Ca'Non, one could wonder..
For something to be considered informal, logically something else must exist, something else which is considered to be formal.
If the {'arlogh Qoylu'pu'} existed looong before anything else, then how the jay' can it be considered informal ? How can it be considered informal if there was nothing else to compare it to ?
The more I think of it, the more everything points to the {'arlogh Qoylu'pu'} being the formal/traditional method of telling time.
~ Qa'yIn _______________________________________________ tlhIngan-Hol mailing list tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
On Jul 29, 2020, at 7:34 AM, Will Martin <willmartin2@mac.com> wrote:
Why assume that tradition is formal?
Bingo. The confusion goes away if you stop worrying about how the original way can be called informal. It might have been the only way in the distant past, but that’s not the case now. Consider the history of “you” vs “thou” in English. Which one do you think is more formal, and why? You’re probably wrong. [No, not you — I know *you* know what happened. I’m talking to the other one.] -- ghunchu'wI'
On 7/27/2020 7:54 AM, mayqel qunen'oS wrote:
I've been going through the various time telling methods.
method #1: (from: "maltz online", HolQeD 8:1, pages 7-12)
tera' rep loS wejmaH "Earth hour 4:30"
method #2: (same source)
cha'logh Qoylu'pu'.
method #3: (Eurotalk TalkNow! Klingon)
Five to twelve (11:55) a.m. wa'maH wa'vatlh vaghmaH vagh rep 11:55 p.m. (23:55) cha'maH wejvatlh vaghmaH vagh rep
As far as the first two methods are concerned, I read okrand's explanation with regards to when they are to be used and/or how and why each method originated. Strangely though, I didn't see in the eurotalk any description as to when this specific method of telling time is to be used, or how it originated in the first place.
Which brings me to the question of this post..
Among the various time telling methods, is there a method which is supposed to be used in more formal settings than the rest ?
And when I say "formal settings" I mean weddings, court trials, religious texts, etc.
"Formal" and "traditional" isn't the right way to categorize this. In the Maltz Online article, Okrand says that Klingons use the *tera' rep *twenty-four hour system "in dealing with time in interplanetary communication." He says "in nonmilitary contexts (rare as these may be) and situations where interplanetary communication is not a concern," Klingons' "most common" method is the *Qoylu'pu'* style.**Neither the /Conversational Klingon/ style nor the expanded version of it in /TalkNow!/ are given contexts in which they are used. CK simply says "Klingons have adopted the way most civilized planets in the galaxy tell time." So we have the information that MOST time-telling is in a military context and uses SOME kind of twenty-four hour system. We have two different versions of these, putting the word *rep* either before or after the numbers, one of which also includes *vatlh*. We don't know for sure whether the *vatlh* version is used specifically in military contexts; I would guess that it is. It seems to simply be a slightly different formation. So my guesses would be: Weddings: *Qoylu'pu'* style, unless the wedding takes place on a ship or military installation. Court Trials: I find it hard to believe that Klingons have any nonmilitary courts, so I would expect one of the 24-hour styles. Religious Texts: Klingons clearly didn't adopt 24-hour time until they got to know Humans, so ancient religious texts would obviously use *Qoylu'pu'* style, unless there were some other style we don't know about. Religion to Klingons seems to be separate from the military, so I would guess even modern religious texts would use *Qoylu'pu'* style. However, we know that Klingon religion extends to Klingon planets beyond Kronos, so maybe this would be a case for an interplanetary 24-hour system. "Interplanetary" might have meant "between Klingon planets and non-Klingon planets," in which case one wonders whether Klingon monks would bother using 24-hour time. Note also in CK that Klingons use 24-hour time with Terran tourists and that tourists' movements are restricted on Klingon planets. It's possible that different areas of a Klingon planet use different nonmilitary time systems to accommodate the locals. I would also expect each planet to bend the rules to accommodate varying planetary rotation speeds. -- SuStel http://trimboli.name
And just to add one more log on the fire, do we know for sure that the {pumpu’} version of telling time stops at 12? I mean the “Hundred hours” method definitely counts to “twenty nine hundred hours” before zeroing out at midnight, but does {pumpu’} reset to “once” after noon? I think we assume this to be the case, but I don’t remember that being explicitly noted. Please tell me that it IS explicitly noted. I just don’t remember it being so. charghwI’ vaghnerya’ngan rInpa’ bomnIS be’’a’ pI’.
On Jul 29, 2020, at 11:12 AM, SuStel <sustel@trimboli.name> wrote:
On 7/27/2020 7:54 AM, mayqel qunen'oS wrote:
I've been going through the various time telling methods.
method #1: (from: "maltz online", HolQeD 8:1, pages 7-12)
tera' rep loS wejmaH "Earth hour 4:30"
method #2: (same source)
cha'logh Qoylu'pu'.
method #3: (Eurotalk TalkNow! Klingon)
Five to twelve (11:55) a.m. wa'maH wa'vatlh vaghmaH vagh rep 11:55 p.m. (23:55) cha'maH wejvatlh vaghmaH vagh rep
As far as the first two methods are concerned, I read okrand's explanation with regards to when they are to be used and/or how and why each method originated. Strangely though, I didn't see in the eurotalk any description as to when this specific method of telling time is to be used, or how it originated in the first place.
Which brings me to the question of this post..
Among the various time telling methods, is there a method which is supposed to be used in more formal settings than the rest ?
And when I say "formal settings" I mean weddings, court trials, religious texts, etc. "Formal" and "traditional" isn't the right way to categorize this. In the Maltz Online article, Okrand says that Klingons use the tera' rep twenty-four hour system "in dealing with time in interplanetary communication." He says "in nonmilitary contexts (rare as these may be) and situations where interplanetary communication is not a concern," Klingons' "most common" method is the Qoylu'pu' style. Neither the Conversational Klingon style nor the expanded version of it in TalkNow! are given contexts in which they are used. CK simply says "Klingons have adopted the way most civilized planets in the galaxy tell time."
So we have the information that MOST time-telling is in a military context and uses SOME kind of twenty-four hour system. We have two different versions of these, putting the word rep either before or after the numbers, one of which also includes vatlh. We don't know for sure whether the vatlh version is used specifically in military contexts; I would guess that it is. It seems to simply be a slightly different formation.
So my guesses would be:
Weddings: Qoylu'pu' style, unless the wedding takes place on a ship or military installation.
Court Trials: I find it hard to believe that Klingons have any nonmilitary courts, so I would expect one of the 24-hour styles.
Religious Texts: Klingons clearly didn't adopt 24-hour time until they got to know Humans, so ancient religious texts would obviously use Qoylu'pu' style, unless there were some other style we don't know about. Religion to Klingons seems to be separate from the military, so I would guess even modern religious texts would use Qoylu'pu' style. However, we know that Klingon religion extends to Klingon planets beyond Kronos, so maybe this would be a case for an interplanetary 24-hour system. "Interplanetary" might have meant "between Klingon planets and non-Klingon planets," in which case one wonders whether Klingon monks would bother using 24-hour time.
Note also in CK that Klingons use 24-hour time with Terran tourists and that tourists' movements are restricted on Klingon planets. It's possible that different areas of a Klingon planet use different nonmilitary time systems to accommodate the locals.
I would also expect each planet to bend the rules to accommodate varying planetary rotation speeds.
-- SuStel http://trimboli.name <http://trimboli.name/>_______________________________________________ tlhIngan-Hol mailing list tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
participants (4)
-
Alan Anderson -
mayqel qunen'oS -
SuStel -
Will Martin