That's an interesting question. The difference in the canon examples is that -be' follows tu' when -jaj or -'a' is appended. I would expect the difference to be that tu'be'lu' means that someone unspecified does not observe (though someone else might), while tu'lu'be' would mean no one observes, but {yIH tu'be'lu'jaj} doesn't follow this pattern. cha'DIch, Soj wa'DIch vIqel: Luis, it was all clear to me except for the last sentence, which evidently I am misinterpreting: "Small deeds of all citizens and important thing(s) are responsible." ~mIp'av On Wednesday, February 16, 2022, mayqel qunen'oS <mihkoun@gmail.com> wrote:
yIn nI' yISIQ 'ej yIchep Live long and prosper! (RT)
Did 'oqranD write this?
voragh:
Finally note the difference between {tu’be’lu’} : and {tu’lu’be’} :
What's the difference? Is there any conclusion to be made from the Ca'Non examples posted? Because I don't see any difference regarding the when each variation is to be used.
-- Dana'an https://sacredtextsinklingon.wordpress.com/ Ζεὺς ἦν, Ζεὺς ἐστίν, Ζεὺς ἔσσεται· ὦ μεγάλε Ζεῦ