That&#39;s an interesting question. The difference in the canon examples is that -be&#39; follows tu&#39; when -jaj or -&#39;a&#39; is appended. I would expect the difference to be that tu&#39;be&#39;lu&#39; means that someone unspecified does not observe (though someone else might), while tu&#39;lu&#39;be&#39; would mean no one observes, but {yIH tu&#39;be&#39;lu&#39;jaj} doesn&#39;t follow this pattern.<div><br></div><div>cha&#39;DIch, Soj wa&#39;DIch vIqel: Luis, it was all clear to me except for the last sentence, which evidently I am misinterpreting: &quot;Small deeds of all citizens and important thing(s) are responsible.&quot;<br><div><br></div><div>~mIp&#39;av<br><br>On Wednesday, February 16, 2022, mayqel qunen&#39;oS &lt;<a href="mailto:mihkoun@gmail.com" target="_blank">mihkoun@gmail.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="auto"><div dir="auto">&gt; yIn nI&#39; yISIQ &#39;ej yIchep</div><div dir="auto">&gt; Live long and prosper! (RT)<br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Did &#39;oqranD write this?</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">voragh:</div><div dir="auto">&gt; Finally note the difference between {tu’be’lu’} : </div><div dir="auto">&gt; and {tu’lu’be’} :</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">What&#39;s the difference? Is there any conclusion to be made from the Ca&#39;Non examples posted? Because I don&#39;t see any difference regarding the when each variation is to be used.</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div data-smartmail="gmail_signature">--<br>Dana&#39;an <br><a href="https://sacredtextsinklingon.wordpress.com/" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">https://sacredtextsinklingon.w<wbr>ordpress.com/</a><br>Ζεὺς ἦν, Ζεὺς ἐστίν, Ζεὺς ἔσσεται· ὦ μεγάλε Ζεῦ</div></div>
</blockquote></div></div>