8 Dec
2016
8 Dec
'16
6:29 a.m.
On 12/8/2016 2:10 AM, Lieven wrote:
What do you think about: {torghvaD taj'e' matlh nobmoH Qugh} having {nob} refer to two differetn objects?
I don't see two objects. I see a beneficiary/indirect object (not an object in the Klingon sentence position way), a topic (not an object), and *matlh* (an object). I read this sentence as /as for knives, Kruge makes Torg give Maltz/ (he is handing Maltz over). -- SuStel http://trimboli.name