On 12/8/2016 2:10 AM, Lieven wrote:

What do you think about:
{torghvaD taj'e' matlh nobmoH Qugh}
having {nob} refer to two differetn objects?

I don't see two objects. I see a beneficiary/indirect object (not an object in the Klingon sentence position way), a topic (not an object), and matlh (an object). I read this sentence as as for knives, Kruge makes Torg give Maltz (he is handing Maltz over).

-- 
SuStel
http://trimboli.name