On 7/23/2022 10:01 AM, D qunen'oS wrote:
However that analysis is "signed" by {DeSDu' jen puqloD}.
So who wrote it? 'oqranD or DeSDu'?
That part of the book is clearly written by DeSDu', as you mention yourself, he signed that part. Anyway, that information is not really so new. Many years ago (around 2012?), I think it was 'ISqu' who wrote an analysis of that no' Hol here on the mailing list. That analysis was one day archived in the Klingon Language Wiki. In the text written by DeSDu', he refers to that page on the Wiki. http://klingon.wiki/En/PaqbatlhAncientKlingon So briefly, the analysis is not canon, but it's a very good analysis of a canon text of ancient Klingon. -- Lieven L. Litaer aka the "Klingon Teacher from Germany" http://www.tlhInganHol.com http://klingon.wiki/En/Paqbatlh