Accidentally sent this off-list. -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: RE: [tlhIngan Hol] The book of our good captain Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 12:35:48 -0400 From: SuStel <sustel@trimboli.name> To: Lieven <levinius@gmx.de> We can’t jump in headlong and blindly accept any QAO without scrutiny, but we do have to acknowledge that QAO is not unquestionably illegal. De’vID’s (I think) question remains unanswered and a good one: if QAO is illegal, /why/ is it illegal? It’s a rule we made up ourselves. If we discount using question words as relative pronouns, what is the justification of preventing questions as the first sentence? *From: *Lieven <mailto:levinius@gmx.de> *Sent: *Wednesday, July 13, 2016 12:23 PM *To: *tlhingan-hol@kli.org <mailto:tlhingan-hol@kli.org> *Subject: *Re: [tlhIngan Hol] The book of our good captain I would not generalize that QAO is legal just because of this one example. -- SuStel http://trimboli.name