Accidentally sent this off-list.
| Subject: | RE: [tlhIngan Hol] The book of our good captain |
|---|---|
| Date: | Wed, 13 Jul 2016 12:35:48 -0400 |
| From: | SuStel <sustel@trimboli.name> |
| To: | Lieven <levinius@gmx.de> |
We can’t jump in headlong and blindly accept any QAO without scrutiny, but we do have to acknowledge that QAO is not unquestionably illegal.
De’vID’s (I think) question remains unanswered and a good one: if QAO is illegal, why is it illegal? It’s a rule we made up ourselves. If we discount using question words as relative pronouns, what is the justification of preventing questions as the first sentence?
From:
Lieven
Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2016 12:23 PM
To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Subject: Re: [tlhIngan Hol] The book of our good
captain
I would not generalize that QAO is legal just because of this one example.
-- SuStel http://trimboli.name