I could find only one example of either method, a NON-CANON line by Qov from DISCOVERY: QongtaHvIS HeghDI' SuvwI', 'oynot, Hom je neH yugh. A warrior who dies in his sleep is no more than flesh and bone. (DSC/Qov "Battle At the Binary Stars") Voragh ________________________________________________________________________ From: tlhIngan-Hol <tlhingan-hol-bounces@lists.kli.org> On Behalf Of SuStel I see only a cat and the chancellor vIghro' Qang je neH vIlegh vIghro neH Qang neH je vIlegh On 11/11/2019 9:06 AM, mayqel qunen'oS wrote: lieven:
I think the second is a bit contradictory, from a logical point of view.
Yes, you're right. I noticed that too, while writing the initial message. But other than that, does this matter come down to just personal preference ? No, I think Lieven has it right. The second sentence not only makes no sense, it doesn't say what you want it to say. It's not a matter of preference. You want to say that you see a cat, the chancellor, and nothing else. You construct the noun phrase vIghro' Qang je cat and chancellor, then you modify that to say that that's all you saw: vIghro' Qang je neH only the cat and the chancellor. -- SuStel http://trimboli.name