4 Oct
2017
4 Oct
'17
3:33 a.m.
On 3 October 2017 at 16:42, SuStel <sustel@trimboli.name> wrote:
On 10/3/2017 10:37 AM, Lieven wrote:
To avoid the problem, I would make this two phrases: {ghu vIlegh. loD ghaH.}
That implies to my mind that the baby is a man. Say this instead: *ghu vIlegh; loDHom ghaH.*
Really? {loD} is defined as "male, man". Having stated {ghu vIlegh}, it's obvious that {loD ghaH} means "he's male". When I read {loDHom ghaH}, it makes me think the baby isn't really a baby but an older child. -- De'vID