1 Jul
2019
1 Jul
'19
5:09 a.m.
Am 01.07.2019 um 09:33 schrieb De'vID:
If no one has anything to add, or suggestions about revising the {petaQ} footnote or opinions about what,
My opinion is that the note about the prefix pe- and so on should be removed, as it's misleading and not canon (iirc). But perhabs we should stay in the game, and give a half solution something likje "rumors say that this word is related to pe+taQ, but that is not confirmed." In that form it's at least clear that that's not a set fact.
if anything, should be done about the apparent slang use of {QaD},
I see no need here. Why not use slang? But that's just my opinion. -- Lieven L. Litaer aka the "Klingon Teacher from Germany" http://www.klingonisch.de http://www.klingonwiki.net/En/Paqbatlh