There’s a similar use of {nungbogh} in the confusing “Message to Kronos”: poH tuj bI'reS nungbogh wa' jaj qeylIS DIS chorghvatlh loSmaH jav qaStaHvIS. [sic] In the days that follow the summer solstice in the Year of Kahless 846. ('U'-MTK) There’s a usage note from qep’a’ 2015 which may be relevant: When asked about navigating lists or events, [Maltz] gave us {vorgh} “be previous” (opposite of {veb} “be next)”. Can also use {nungbogh} ({nung” “precede”) … {vorgh} was used in the NASM tour (North American X-15): muDDaq neH muD Dujmey vorgh lu'orlu', 'ach loghDaq puvlaH Dujmey 'orbogh nuv 'e' 'agh X-wa'maH vagh. -- Voragh On Behalf Of Brian Cote Interesting. I should have included the original text. This is what Kotar and Molor Have said to Kahless In the hours before battle. I would have assumed a {qaStaHvIS} construction here. On Thursday, January 5, 2017, <sustel@trimboli.name<mailto:sustel@trimboli.name>> wrote: Indeed. Is it an emphasized time stamp? Is it a topic? Is it both? From: Brian Cote<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','wearetheinformation00@gmail.com');> No big question here, but I came across this time stamp in the paq'batlh and found it very interesting. paq'raD 14:19-21 may' lunungbogh repmey'e' qeylISvaD mu'meyvam ja'ta' molor qotar je