Re: [tlhIngan Hol] subject of the -bogh clause of a sao being the subject of another verb

On 7/28/2020 9:05 AM, mayqel qunen'oS wrote:

Qap yuQDaj; Dun 'e' tulbogh nuv his planet wins; the person who hopes that is great

(I placed the semicolon just to show how I understand the sentence)

Is there anything wrong with writing something like this ? I can't think of any grammar rule(s) being broken. The rule you're breaking is that the *'e'* needs to refer to the previous sentence. You're trying to use it to refer to the previous but one sentence.

-- SuStel http://trimboli.name