'arHa':
jarvam tlhIngan Hol vIHaD 'e' vItaghta'
The {-ta'} on the {vItaghta'} is illegal; we can't have a type 7 suffix on the verb that follows the {'e'}. Also I would prefer the {jarvam} to be placed before the {vItaghta'}, thus having: {tlhIngan Hol vIHaD. jarvam 'e' vItaghta'}. But that's just personal preference. qunnoq On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 5:56 AM, Ed Bailey <bellerophon.modeler@gmail.com> wrote:
Aurélie, maHvaD bIjatlhpu' <SaqIHneS>. naDev bIjatlhnISbe' <neS>.
qaStaHvIS loS DIS tlhIngan Hol vIHaDqu'taH, 'a tugh SoH po' law' jIH po' puS 'e' vIpIH.
mIp'av 'oH pongwIj'e'. 'amerIqa' vIDab je, QISta' vIrur. (QISta', jIjatlhbe' <Hello> 'a wej jIjor.)
~mIp'av
HochvaD QInHom vIchel: vIraS'e' Dabmo' ghojwI'vam chu' maQuchba'. nenchoHmeH raS'ISvam wItungHa'jaj!
'arHavaD QInHom cha'DIch vIchel: There is one word in TKD that has -ghach on a bare stem: lo'laHghach. Unless it originated as lo'+laH+ghach?
_______________________________________________ tlhIngan-Hol mailing list tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org