ghe’’orDaq [luSpet ‘oH DaqlIj’e’] For purposes of this discussion I am giving it the benefit of the doubt. Even this way is not of the X-Daq PRO Y-‘e’ variety. -- SuStel http://trimboli.name From: Lieven Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 1:45 AM To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org Subject: Re: [tlhIngan Hol] Saying I'm not there Am 09.10.2017 um 05:41 schrieb SuStel:
Here's a sort-of example: *ghe''orDaq luSpet 'oH DaqlIj'e'.* But it's not of the same form as the others, so it's not a good data point.
True. Besides, this example also includes the long discussed "possible" error of having a type five suffix on the first part of a noun noun construction: [ghe''orDaq luSpet] 'oH [DaqlIj]-'e' -- Lieven L. Litaer aka the "Klingon Teacher from Germany" http://www.klingonisch.net http://www.klingonwiki.net/En/Locatives _______________________________________________ tlhIngan-Hol mailing list tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org