ghe’’orDaq [luSpet ‘oH DaqlIj’e’]

For purposes of this discussion I am giving it the benefit of the doubt. Even this way is not of the X-Daq PRO Y-‘e’ variety.

--
SuStel
http://trimboli.name

From: Lieven
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 1:45 AM
To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Subject: Re: [tlhIngan Hol] Saying I'm not there

Am 09.10.2017 um 05:41 schrieb SuStel:

> Here's a sort-of example: *ghe''orDaq luSpet 'oH DaqlIj'e'.* But it's

> not of the same form as the others, so it's not a good data point.

True. Besides, this example also includes the long discussed "possible"

error of having a type five suffix on the first part of a noun noun

construction:

[ghe''orDaq luSpet] 'oH [DaqlIj]-'e'

--

Lieven L. Litaer

aka the "Klingon Teacher from Germany"

http://www.klingonisch.net

http://www.klingonwiki.net/En/Locatives

_______________________________________________

tlhIngan-Hol mailing list

tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org

http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org