On 12/20/2016 5:50 PM, De'vID wrote:
On Dec 20, 2016 19:52, "mayqel qunenoS" <mihkoun@gmail.com <mailto:mihkoun@gmail.com>> wrote:
however, when a word carries the {-'egh}, isn't that word incapable of
having an object ?
De'vID:
> romuluSngan HoH'eghmoHlaH'a' tlhIngan?
I can't understand this.. "the klingon is able to make himself kill the romulan" ?
Is this canon
wotvaD mojaq vIchel'eghmoHta'DI' Dayajbe''a'?
I can follow the English-to-Klingon logic of these sentences, but I do not see the sequence of grammatical rules that construct them from Klingon originally and legally. Unless you're saying that we can read this as *vI- [chel'egh] -moH*/I cause it to self-add,/ where *chel'egh* is being treated as a separate verb. -- SuStel http://trimboli.name