On Dec 20, 2016 19:52, "mayqel qunenoS" <mihkoun@gmail.com> wrote:

however, when a word carries the {-'egh}, isn't that word incapable of 

having an object ?

De'vID:

> romuluSngan HoH'eghmoHlaH'a' tlhIngan?

I can't understand this.. "the klingon is able to make himself kill the romulan" ?

Is this canon 

wotvaD mojaq vIchel'eghmoHta'DI' Dayajbe''a'?

I can follow the English-to-Klingon logic of these sentences, but I do not see the sequence of grammatical rules that construct them from Klingon originally and legally. Unless you're saying that we can read this as vI- [chel'egh] -moH I cause it to self-add, where chel'egh is being treated as a separate verb.

-- 
SuStel
http://trimboli.name